It would be an incredible achievement if patients across the country were able to receive the full spectrum of reproductive health services, including medical abortion, through their own GP clinic

IN the wake of the downfall of Roe v Wade that left many in a state of shock, it was equally shocking to learn that the alarming ruling made by the Supreme Court didn’t send US legislation well behind that of Australia’s, but rather left both on relatively equal footing.

There is no constitutional right to access abortion in Australia, and the legal status of the medical procedure is decided by state and territory governments. The fortunate difference between the US and Australia is that most states and territories have removed abortion from their criminal code; however, the decriminalisation process has been painstakingly slow, with South Australia doing so only weeks ago.

While the events taking place in the US are a chilling reminder that there is never a time for complacency when it comes to women’s reproductive rights, it is also a time to turn outrage into action. In the flurry of discourse that has erupted in recent weeks, we have been reminded that there is still a long way to go when it comes to abortion access in Australia.

Public health systems are generally not integrated with abortion services and therefore don’t offer them – a disconnect that could potentially make it easier for state governments to further restrict access if they were motivated to do so in the way we have seen in the US.

Improving access via the public health system is a vital step for ensuring equitable abortion access for Australian women, especially those in rural and remote areas. So too is improving access through Australia’s primary care network – for GPs there is huge potential to make a real difference to abortion access.

For many women of reproductive age, GPs will not only be their first point of contact with the health system, but often their only point of contact as this is a cohort of generally healthy individuals. For women who find themselves pregnant and considering abortion, it is vital for GPs to be equipped with the tools to empower women to make the choice that is right for them and trust that they will be guided down their chosen path with professional support and accurate advice.

The most obvious answer to embedding reproductive rights within primary care is for GPs to become providers of early medication abortion or to encourage an interested GP within each clinic to do so.

The training to prescribe MS-2 Step (a combination of mifepristone and misoprostol) is freely available and can be completed online. Since its approval by the Therapeutic Goods Administration in 2014, the uptake of MS-2 Step has steadily increased over time. However, as recently as 2019, 30% of women lived in areas in which GPs did not prescribe MS-2 Step. This proportion was 50% for women living in remote areas, where access to abortion is already extremely difficult.

While we wait for training on medical abortion to be incorporated into the GP curriculum and for improved funding, with increasing resources and a gradual dispelling of myths, such as a poor safety profile or efficacy rate of early medical abortion, there has never been a better time to upskill in this area. It would be an incredible achievement if patients across the country were able to receive the full spectrum of reproductive health services, including medical abortion, through their own GP clinic.

In addition to the online training, there is a wealth of practical advice and tips on early medical abortion available through a recent webinar hosted by North Western Melbourne Primary Health Network that is now free to access. The webinar features an informative presentation by Melbourne-based GP Dr Lynda-Rose Chapeyama, who demystifies the process of providing early medical abortions in the clinic setting and shares her approach to managing early pregnancy presentations. This includes how to promote a safe space for women requiring early pregnancy ultrasound scans with well written referrals and a thorough approach to safety netting, alongside suggested strategies for pain management and other potential MS-2 Step side effects.

Medical termination, while safe and effective, will not be preferred by all women seeking abortion services and some will not be eligible, as it is only appropriate up to 9 weeks’ gestation. Knowing how and where patients can access surgical abortion is also important. Resources such as HealthPathways can be useful depending on the local area.

No discussion around abortion is complete without also considering contraception – an important aspect of clinical care for all women of reproductive age. This is a particularly important conversation to have with women considering or after having an abortion.

The use of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) is associated with a lower likelihood of repeat early medical abortion, and some contraceptive options, namely the progestogen-only pill, seem to be associated with an increased likelihood of repeat early medical abortion. These are important considerations when advising women of their potential options for contraception.

Upskilling to insert LARCs, or knowing which colleagues to refer to for insertion, should form part of routine abortion care in general practice. It is often more convenient, quicker and with less out-of-pocket expenses for patients to see a GP for insertion rather than attend other specialty services.

Embedding the full spectrum of reproductive health care within general practice will strengthen women’s reproductive rights, alongside improving health outcomes for women and allowing them to be cared for by practitioners who they are known to and who will offer long-term follow-up.

While we can be cautiously optimistic that the National Women’s Health Strategy (2020–2030) listed “equitable access to pregnancy termination services” as a “key measure of success”, there has yet to be any meaningful action in this space, but GPs can take matters into their own hands.

While we wait, hope, advocate and campaign for improved reproductive health care, we can offer our patients comprehensive reproductive services that empower women to take control of their reproductive health and support them as they navigate abortion access across Australia.

Dr Alisha Dorrigan is a Sydney-based GP and Deputy Medical Editor for the Medical Journal of Australia.



The statements or opinions expressed in this article reflect the views of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official policy of the AMA, the MJA or InSight+ unless so stated.

Subscribe to the free InSight+ weekly newsletter here. It is available to all readers, not just registered medical practitioners.

If you would like to submit an article for consideration, send a Word version to


Abortion care must be part of the core curriculum for GP and ob/gyn training
  • Strongly agree (63%, 133 Votes)
  • Strongly disagree (18%, 37 Votes)
  • Agree (11%, 24 Votes)
  • Neutral (4%, 9 Votes)
  • Disagree (3%, 7 Votes)

Total Voters: 210

Loading ... Loading ...

3 thoughts on “Embedding women’s reproductive rights into primary care

  1. Amy C says:

    “Embedding women’s reproductive rights into primary care” should also include a woman’s right to receive the health care for her reproductive organs that suits her & her life situation, not having doctors trying to coerce her that she’ll “change her mind” about not having children, or telling her that she’s “young & healthy” so she shouldn’t be thinking about a hysterectomy…..38 isn’t young to be having a baby, that’s why it gets labelled a geriatric pregnancy. And healthy, well in my case that couldn’t be farther from the truth….
    Women’s reproductive rights shouldn’t only be about pregnancy & abortions….they should encompass everything connected with a woman’s reproductive system & the hormones involved, from puberty to menopause & beyond. And they should respect a woman’s right to not have children, & that if she has a problem with her reproductive organs, to get them removed if that’s the answer, no matter how young she might be!

  2. Dr Melanie Dorrington says:

    Abortion access, options (and limitations), as well as impact of not accessing a wanted abortion, needs to be a part of the teaching curriculum in medical school and for GP + O&G. This should not be approached as an ethical dilemma around “when does life begin” – we need to concentrate on the person presenting to us who feels they do not have the material or emotional or physical capacity to endure a pregnancy and bringing another person into their household.
    For those who respond with the option of fostering and adoption – please first consider the morbidity and mortality you are asking these pregnant people to face, and also the social expectations around pregnancy (including that you are happy about it, and that you will be caring for a baby in a few months), and all of the issues we hear about through the media with the out of home care environment.

  3. Dr Judith Dean (PhD, RN and Midwife) says:

    Abortion care should also be core curriculum of nursing and midwifery training along with skills in providing comprehensive contraception and pregnancy opitons care and recognising and providing care to people experienceing reproduction coercion and abuse.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *