WITH late human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection diagnoses remaining relatively common, experts say having a lack of options for self-testing kits is a missing piece in HIV management in Australia.
A study published by the MJA has shown that two types of HIV self-testing (blood and oral-based) are easy and acceptable to use, with the oral-based test being the preferred option. The findings suggest that greater access could encourage more testing between men who have sex with men.
Currently, there is only one blood-based HIV self-test available in Australia. This is out of step with many other countries, according to the President of the Australasian Society for HIV, Viral Hepatitis and Sexual Health Medicine, Dr Nicholas Medland.
â[Weâre] really behind the rest of the world in the range of testing options. Most parts of the world have had a range of self-testing, home testing and post-infection testing for some years,â he told InSight+.
The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) approved the blood-based self-test in November 2018; however, until October 2021, it was only available online. In order to purchase a test, before October 2021, there was also a requirement to view an instructional video.
In December 2021, self-tests were expanded to two pharmacies in New South Wales and Western Australia before being rolled out further in 2022.
âPutting extra obstacles in defeats its purpose. So, it has gotten easier but our research, and this study has shown that to date, uptake has been very limited numbers in Australia,â Dr Medland said.
The authors of the MJA study wrote: âIn surveys of the Sydney gay community during 2019 and 2020, fewer than 1% of HIV-negative participants reported that their most recent HIV test had been a self-test.â.
Stigma and cost barriers of self-testing
According to Dr Medland, there are many groups in Australia who do regular testing but there are also many men who donât.
âWeâve got a group of people we know that regularly get tested, go into clinics and get tested. Itâs expensive to them, itâs expensive to the health care system.
âBut weâve always known that there are a somewhat smaller group of people who donât get tested very often. One of the reasons is that going into a clinic is not convenient, or maybe the clinic is not accessible,â he said.
According to one of the MJA study authors, Associate Professor Eric Chow, one group that doesnât get regular testing is men born outside Australia.
âIt may be that in some cultural backgrounds, HIV is actually quite stigmatised in their own country, and they may be quite reluctant to go to a sexual health [clinic],â he explained.
The study found 89% of participants said they would be likely to use self-testing again, 78% said they would offer it to a regular partner and 67% said they would offer it to a casual partner.
Participants born outside Australia were three times as likely to want to use self-testing again.
âGiven the high late diagnosis rate for overseas-born men who have sex with men, HIV self-testing, coupled with other culturally appropriate approaches, should be a greater focus in our HIV prevention strategy,â the authors wrote.
The current self-test cost is $25, which the study authors suggest could be a barrier, particularly with overseas-born men.
âA targeted self-testing program should consider reducing its cost,â they suggested.
Dr Medland agreed.
âIf youâre on a low income, itâs not covered by the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme or anything like that, the cost will be a barrier for people who are short of money,â he said.
Self-testing was easy to use and acceptable
The MJA research found that most participants found self-testing easy to use and acceptable.
The participants could choose whether they read the instructions or watched an instructional video, and nine out of ten preferred to read instructions.
âNo participants received invalid results with the oral fluid-based HIV self-test, and only 1% did so with the blood-based test,â the authors wrote.
Associate Professor Chow said the key was easy-to-understand education.
âApart from just selling the kit, itâs really important to inform the people who are going to do the test that you need to read the instructions properly,â he said.
When it came to preference, most participants preferred the oral fluid test.
âThe likelihood of being regarded as easy to use was three times as high for the oral fluid test as for the blood self-test, and a larger proportion of participants preferred the oral fluid test (58% v 41% for the blood-based test),â the authors wrote.
Australia is committed to the elimination of HIV transmission, and Dr Medland believes more testing is a crucial component.
âThe critical part of elimination of HIV transmission is regular testing. If somebody gets a test, and if theyâre HIV-positive, they can go to treatment, and there is no more transmission. If theyâre HIV-negative, they can get HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis, so no more transmission,â he said.
âThe important finding of this study is that one of the globally most commonly used testing types, the oral fluid testing, is really preferable. The currently available type of test is a blood-based test.
âSo, it really indicates there is a missing piece,â he concluded.
Subscribe to the free InSight+ weekly newsletter here. It is available to all readers, not just registered medical practitioners.
A study published by the MJA has shown that two types of HIV self-testing (blood and oral-based) are easy and acceptable to use, with the oral-based test being the preferred option. The findings suggest that greater access could encourage more testing between men who have sex with men.
Currently, there is only one blood-based HIV self-test available in Australia. This is out of step with many other countries, according to the President of the Australasian Society for HIV, Viral Hepatitis and Sexual Health Medicine, Dr Nicholas Medland.
â[Weâre] really behind the rest of the world in the range of testing options. Most parts of the world have had a range of self-testing, home testing and post-infection testing for some years,â he told InSight+.
The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) approved the blood-based self-test in November 2018; however, until October 2021, it was only available online. In order to purchase a test, before October 2021, there was also a requirement to view an instructional video.
In December 2021, self-tests were expanded to two pharmacies in New South Wales and Western Australia before being rolled out further in 2022.
âPutting extra obstacles in defeats its purpose. So, it has gotten easier but our research, and this study has shown that to date, uptake has been very limited numbers in Australia,â Dr Medland said.
The authors of the MJA study wrote: âIn surveys of the Sydney gay community during 2019 and 2020, fewer than 1% of HIV-negative participants reported that their most recent HIV test had been a self-test.â.
Stigma and cost barriers of self-testing
According to Dr Medland, there are many groups in Australia who do regular testing but there are also many men who donât.
âWeâve got a group of people we know that regularly get tested, go into clinics and get tested. Itâs expensive to them, itâs expensive to the health care system.
âBut weâve always known that there are a somewhat smaller group of people who donât get tested very often. One of the reasons is that going into a clinic is not convenient, or maybe the clinic is not accessible,â he said.
According to one of the MJA study authors, Associate Professor Eric Chow, one group that doesnât get regular testing is men born outside Australia.
âIt may be that in some cultural backgrounds, HIV is actually quite stigmatised in their own country, and they may be quite reluctant to go to a sexual health [clinic],â he explained.
The study found 89% of participants said they would be likely to use self-testing again, 78% said they would offer it to a regular partner and 67% said they would offer it to a casual partner.
Participants born outside Australia were three times as likely to want to use self-testing again.
âGiven the high late diagnosis rate for overseas-born men who have sex with men, HIV self-testing, coupled with other culturally appropriate approaches, should be a greater focus in our HIV prevention strategy,â the authors wrote.
The current self-test cost is $25, which the study authors suggest could be a barrier, particularly with overseas-born men.
âA targeted self-testing program should consider reducing its cost,â they suggested.
Dr Medland agreed.
âIf youâre on a low income, itâs not covered by the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme or anything like that, the cost will be a barrier for people who are short of money,â he said.
Self-testing was easy to use and acceptable
The MJA research found that most participants found self-testing easy to use and acceptable.
The participants could choose whether they read the instructions or watched an instructional video, and nine out of ten preferred to read instructions.
âNo participants received invalid results with the oral fluid-based HIV self-test, and only 1% did so with the blood-based test,â the authors wrote.
Associate Professor Chow said the key was easy-to-understand education.
âApart from just selling the kit, itâs really important to inform the people who are going to do the test that you need to read the instructions properly,â he said.
When it came to preference, most participants preferred the oral fluid test.
âThe likelihood of being regarded as easy to use was three times as high for the oral fluid test as for the blood self-test, and a larger proportion of participants preferred the oral fluid test (58% v 41% for the blood-based test),â the authors wrote.
Australia is committed to the elimination of HIV transmission, and Dr Medland believes more testing is a crucial component.
âThe critical part of elimination of HIV transmission is regular testing. If somebody gets a test, and if theyâre HIV-positive, they can go to treatment, and there is no more transmission. If theyâre HIV-negative, they can get HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis, so no more transmission,â he said.
âThe important finding of this study is that one of the globally most commonly used testing types, the oral fluid testing, is really preferable. The currently available type of test is a blood-based test.
âSo, it really indicates there is a missing piece,â he concluded.
Subscribe to the free InSight+ weekly newsletter here. It is available to all readers, not just registered medical practitioners.
Loading commentsâŚ
More from this week
InSight+ updates
29 April 2026
InSight+ reimagined: medical news and commentary redesigned with clinicians in mind
Disability
27 April 2026
Tightened eligibility and cuts to plans: what the NDIS changes mean for participants
Child health
27 April 2026
Childhood BMI changes genetically linked to adulthood diabetes and heart disease
Neurology
27 April 2026
Functional neurological disorder in Australia: disabling, stigmatised, and under-served
Sexual health
27 April 2026
Why GPs should be on the lookout for syphilis
Newsletters
Subscribe to the InSight+ newsletter
Immediate and free access to the latest articles
No spam, you can unsubscribe anytime you want.
By providing your information, you agree to our Access Terms and our Privacy Policy. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.