YOUNG people are “falling through the cracks” in Australia’s fragmented mental health system, say researchers who have found that almost three in four young people who died by suicide were males, and 40% of suicide deaths occurred among young people living in low socio-economic areas.

An analysis of National Coronial Information, published in this week’s MJA, found that 3365 young people (aged 10–24 years) died by suicide in Australia between 2006 and 2015.

Of these deaths, 2473 (73.5%) were among young men, and 1292 people (38.4%) lived in areas of greater socio-economic disadvantage.

Speaking in an exclusive InSight+ podcast, research co-author Associate Professor Jo Robinson said the research revealed that young people were “falling through the cracks of a fragmented system”.

“They might be young people who are presenting for help and being turned away,” said Professor Robinson, who is Head of the Suicide Prevention Research Unit at Orygen. “It might be young people who are being discharged prematurely without proper follow-up care. It might be young people who are coming to headspace, but their needs might be too complex for a service like headspace, although they are not quite sick enough for a service like Orygen.”

Professor Ian Hickie, Co-Director, Health and Policy at the University of Sydney’s Brain and Mind Centre, said the situation had sadly worsened since 2015, pointing to Australian Bureau of Statistics data released last month.

“We have seen the continued rise in self-harm and an increase in deaths in young women at younger ages has also continued,” Professor Hickie said. “This is despite the fact that we have an emphasis on suicide prevention on youth services – we are still struggling to connect with those in greatest need.”

And, Professor Hickie added, this increase was before the impact of COVID-19, which has been forecast to increase the risk of deaths by suicide.

He said the continued high rates of suicide among young men suggested that “real-estate-based” approaches to mental health care were inadequate.

“Traditional clinical services connect more with young women,” he said, adding that efforts were needed to reach at-risk young men in their own environments.

Professor Hickie said the higher rates of suicide reported among young people in lower socio-economic areas highlighted the inequitable access to services.

“The lower SES areas, particularly the outer urban areas of our cities and many of our rural and regional areas often have less services,” Professor Hickie said. “We have almost an inverse relationship between the need and service location. And this is then compounded by the often high out of pocket costs associated with psychological services.”

In the paper, the authors found that at the time of death 29.0% of people were enrolled in education or training and 33% of people were employed at the time of death, leaving just under 40% of people who were neither employed nor in education or training.

Lead author of the MJA article Nicole Hill, Research Fellow at the Telethon Kids Institute and PhD candidate at Orygen, told InSight+ that this was important.

“When we looked at the proportion of young people who died by suicide, approximately 30% were enrolled in school, uni or TAFE, at the time of death. In other words, two out of three young people who died by suicide were not actually enrolled in the education system or were otherwise disengaged from the education system at the time of their suicide,” Ms Hill said.

“That’s really important when we are thinking about potential avenues for reaching this at-risk population.” Scientia Professor Helen Christensen, Director and Chief Scientist at the Black Dog Institute, said the findings flagged a potential lack of contact with mental health services. While more than half (57%) of young people had either diagnosed or possible mental health problems at the time of death, fewer than one-third were receiving psychological and/or pharmacological mental health treatment at the time of their death.

She said this suggested that different approaches to prevention were required, including new sorts of health services, school-based screening and early intervention.

Professor Christensen said digital services that provided outreach before or after a suicide attempt were also promising.

“We have been developing some along these lines – RAFT and Lifebuoy – which are currently in trial but with promising outcomes,” she said, adding that digital platforms were particularly useful in rural and remote settings. Professor Christensen also noted that not all young people who died by suicide had “mental health problems”, with 41% having a diagnosed mental health disorder and 16% having possible mental health disorders.

“Other factors, such as a relationship breakdown, should also be considered strongly,” Professor Christensen said, noting that 21% of those who died by suicide had had a relationship breakdown in the past year.

“High relationship break-up figures suggest an approach to literacy around relationships linked to preventative work around emotional control may be beneficial,” she said.

A history of illicit drug use was recorded for 28% of the 3027 people for whom these data were available, and self-harm for 31%.

Associate Professor Robinson said presentations for self-harm were important opportunities for intervention.

“What we are seeing are increasing numbers of young females presenting for help for things like self-harm and being turned away from services and not getting the treatment that they necessarily need,” she said. “What we lose there is an opportunity for intervention.”

Professor Hickie said there should be no doubt about the link between self-harm and suicide risk.

“There is great myth in many service environments that self-harm is not linked to death by suicide, when it is,” he said.

The MJA article has been published in the week after the release of the final report of the Productivity Commission Mental Health Inquiry.

If this article has raised issues for you please reach out to any of the following resources:


  • NSW and ACT … 02 9437 6552
  • Victoria … 03 9280 8712
  • Tasmania … 1800 991 997
  • Queensland … 07 3833 4352
  • WA … 08 9321 3098
  • SA and NT … 08 8366 0250

Lifeline … 13 11 14


Kids Helpline … 1800 55 1800


Suicide Call Back Service … 1300 659 467

3 thoughts on “Suicide: young people are “falling through the cracks”

  1. Anonymous says:

    Dear Anonymous,
    Thank you for taking the time to clearly outline the real issues. Completed suicide is the only option for a person who feels they have no hope. Will there ever be a time when our society can turn the lens on the structural facts we have built into our systems that consistently remove hope from our young people? The only “cure” for the increasing suicide rate is to deliberately create a society and associated systems that creates and sustains hope by consciously choosing to engage with all people as human beings, and the environment as the source of sustenance for us humans, rather than just insisting that we are all merely consumers in the economy.

  2. Anonymous says:

    A very valuable comment above from someone with lived experience — thank you for taking the time.

  3. Anonymous says:

    There are so many things to unpack here.

    40% of youth who suicide are from areas of greater socio-economic disadvantage, 40% of those youth were neither employed nor in education or training. This is what puts them at risk of mental health issues, and also at risk of being unable to access appropriate services. Can we please address THIS.

    If they sought help with their mental health issues – would this actually address the underlying problem?? ie. of unemployment, lack of education, insecure housing, lack of income and supports. [I am unfamiliar with Orygen services]

    I can only speak of my lived experience.

    As someone who has experienced homelessness (albeit briefly), low income, little to no supports – a lot of stressful things, outside of my control – what I needed most was financial support. I first accessed mental health services – to “prove” that I was independent from my alcoholic step-father, so that I could receive youth allowance.

    Most functioning families should be able to provide evidence of parental income – but being estranged (read: kicked out of home) by my step-father, after my mother’s death from cancer – I did not have the means to provide information about his income (which Centrelink would actually have information on – and would have “qualified” me for youth allowance in and of itself). BUT the process was that I needed to provide evidence of his income OR to “prove” that I was no longer living with him. I had to prove that I was independent by seeking mental health services and obtaining a letter to explain why I was not living with my step-father. The greatest stress to my existence was having insecure accommodation, no guarantee that I could support myself through my university studies on the small income I received working as a kitchen-hand. (Lucky for me, I later tutored at university which resulted in much greater income for less hours work, and later again, I worked 4 days a week in corporate whilst presumably attending university “full-time” – so my financial circumstances changed over the course).

    It is shameful that it is so hard for someone at a time of greatest need to be able to access and receive services, yet my friends from functional families – who were earning a greater income in jobs provided for them by their parents [true account]. Who were still living at home – could more easily prove their “independence” because they had met the “earning” requirement (which I think at the time was something like $13000 in 18 months). Yet, they did not even have a genuine need for this “supplement”. I accessed this supplement for only a brief period as I was fortunate enough to change my circumstances (as described previously).

    For people like myself we are told that we are not “resilient” enough, by mental health services. That the problem is with “us”. Yet my circumstances were largely outside of my control.

    I recall when I accessed university mental health services stating my mother had died when I was 19 (first year university), my father was an alcoholic, I had worked two concurrent jobs supporting myself throughout university, and now my step-father had attempted suicide and I needed to provide care for my younger siblings – that the mental health issue I had was “rigidity”.

    Well, yes, I was anxious – and quite understandably so. But working on my anxiety wasn’t the underlying problem!

    I can only assume it is even worse for others whose circumstances are largely outside of their control. I was “lucky” in that I was 19 and able to work etc. My younger siblings were less fortunate as they were only 11 and 12 at the time of my mother’s death and dependent on their father who was unable to cope. They lived in public housing with him for a time (until he abandoned them!) – but were also “lucky” in being able to obtain public housing because their uncle is a social worker and were “sped” through the waiting process.

    It breaks my heart when I think about all of these things that occurred. And the overwhelming lack of support that my siblings received. We are all “battlers”. I remember another mental health professional I saw once who reflected on my situation – and commented that “it was lucky” that my siblings were not on the streets. How “lucky” they are. [I get it, positivity, and looking at how things “could be worse”].

    And sadly, it appears – they “can be worse”.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *