IT’S often said that, when you compare somebody with an opposing point of view to the Nazis, you’ve lost the argument.
If that’s true, a letter I received last week didn’t take long to self-combust.
“The mainstream medical media in Australia are no better than the Nazi Party propaganda machine from World War II,” it said, comparing the actions of today’s medical journalists with those of the war criminals tried at Nuremberg.
The anonymous letter was sent by post, personally addressed to me in a way that indicated the sender had done some minor investigative work.
Signed “A Patriotic Australian”, it included a PO Box address that has apparently also been used in similar letters sent to health professionals and other journalists.
Bristling with American-style rhetoric – “We the People demand …” – the missive contained among other things an apparent death threat.
“The Global Cabal, Our Tyrannical Government and Mockingbird Fake News Media will ultimately lose this war, which they have declared on humanity. We, the living men, women and children of the land known as Australia, will be the victors and the results will be swift and final,” the letter read.
“We believe the crimes you are involved in are acts of genocide.”
And then in bold type: “The death penalty is enforceable for those who are convicted of genocide. Will this be YOU?”
I wrote earlier this year about the abuse some health experts have received for speaking publicly about the impact of COVID-19.
That’s an ongoing issue. Sydney virologist Professor Dominic Dwyer told The Guardian last week he’d been called a traitor to his country after travelling to Wuhan to investigate the origins of COVID-19 on behalf of the World Health Organization.
And it’s not just those in the public eye. I’ve also written about the abuse of customer service staff seeking to enforce COVID-19 rules.
A Melbourne bookshop last week revealed it had been forced to hire security after physical attacks on staff by customers refusing to follow the rules. One worker had allegedly been pushed down an escalator.
The same week, a Melbourne café owner said he was afraid to go to work after vandals damaged his premises, leaving this sign: “Do what Daniel Andrews says and we will burn your shop down.”
At first glance, the threat I received might seem as silly as other claims in the letter, such as those declaring the pandemic to be both “fake” and “planned”.
It’s a sad fact that anybody who publicly advocates for a scientific approach on contentious issues has to learn to tolerate a certain amount of abuse. Whether the subject matter is vaccines or climate change, it comes with the territory.
But threats of violence, whether directed at health professionals, journalists or retail staff, can’t be ignored.
“We have been watching and recording each of your actions,” my letter says.
“If you fail to correct your corrupt position, you will surely be held to account. At some time in the future, the investigations will flow unhindered and there will be no limiting force to stay the hand of lawful justice…
“We See You.”
Laughable, yes, but maybe a bit more than a joke.
Jane McCredie is a Sydney-based science and health writer.
The statements or opinions expressed in this article reflect the views of the authors and do not represent the official policy of the AMA, the MJA or InSight+ unless so stated.
If that’s true, a letter I received last week didn’t take long to self-combust.
“The mainstream medical media in Australia are no better than the Nazi Party propaganda machine from World War II,” it said, comparing the actions of today’s medical journalists with those of the war criminals tried at Nuremberg.
The anonymous letter was sent by post, personally addressed to me in a way that indicated the sender had done some minor investigative work.
Signed “A Patriotic Australian”, it included a PO Box address that has apparently also been used in similar letters sent to health professionals and other journalists.
Bristling with American-style rhetoric – “We the People demand …” – the missive contained among other things an apparent death threat.
“The Global Cabal, Our Tyrannical Government and Mockingbird Fake News Media will ultimately lose this war, which they have declared on humanity. We, the living men, women and children of the land known as Australia, will be the victors and the results will be swift and final,” the letter read.
“We believe the crimes you are involved in are acts of genocide.”
And then in bold type: “The death penalty is enforceable for those who are convicted of genocide. Will this be YOU?”
I wrote earlier this year about the abuse some health experts have received for speaking publicly about the impact of COVID-19.
That’s an ongoing issue. Sydney virologist Professor Dominic Dwyer told The Guardian last week he’d been called a traitor to his country after travelling to Wuhan to investigate the origins of COVID-19 on behalf of the World Health Organization.
And it’s not just those in the public eye. I’ve also written about the abuse of customer service staff seeking to enforce COVID-19 rules.
A Melbourne bookshop last week revealed it had been forced to hire security after physical attacks on staff by customers refusing to follow the rules. One worker had allegedly been pushed down an escalator.
The same week, a Melbourne café owner said he was afraid to go to work after vandals damaged his premises, leaving this sign: “Do what Daniel Andrews says and we will burn your shop down.”
At first glance, the threat I received might seem as silly as other claims in the letter, such as those declaring the pandemic to be both “fake” and “planned”.
It’s a sad fact that anybody who publicly advocates for a scientific approach on contentious issues has to learn to tolerate a certain amount of abuse. Whether the subject matter is vaccines or climate change, it comes with the territory.
But threats of violence, whether directed at health professionals, journalists or retail staff, can’t be ignored.
“We have been watching and recording each of your actions,” my letter says.
“If you fail to correct your corrupt position, you will surely be held to account. At some time in the future, the investigations will flow unhindered and there will be no limiting force to stay the hand of lawful justice…
“We See You.”
Laughable, yes, but maybe a bit more than a joke.
Jane McCredie is a Sydney-based science and health writer.
The statements or opinions expressed in this article reflect the views of the authors and do not represent the official policy of the AMA, the MJA or InSight+ unless so stated.
Loading comments…
More from this week
Health policy
18 May 2026
Budget 2026-27 analysis: urgent care, public dental, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health
Indigenous health
18 May 2026
Trachoma successfully eliminated in Australia through Indigenous-led health care
Newsletters
Subscribe to the InSight+ newsletter
Immediate and free access to the latest articles
No spam, you can unsubscribe anytime you want.
By providing your information, you agree to our Access Terms and our Privacy Policy. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.