AUSTRALIA is considered a COVID-19 success story by international standards, notwithstanding the significant health and economic impacts experienced across the country. The level of pandemic-induced disruption has been profound, with COVID-19 catapulting us all, as individuals and communities, into new ways of being.

Governments around the world have responded to COVID-19 differently. Since the pandemic was declared by the World Health Organization in March 2020, we have witnessed significant social policy reforms in Australia with the rapid introduction of evidence-based (and at times, long-debated) policy change, including free childcare, accommodation for people experiencing homelessness, wage subsidies, widespread uptake of flexible and remote working arrangements, and the rollout of telehealth. Despite the temporary nature of some reforms, it is indisputable that change is in the air.

Alongside the rapidly changing policy environment is growing evidence of changing community attitudes and expectations. Public support has increased in some critical areas, including support for action to protect and promote health, the use of scientific evidence to inform decision making, and the leadership role of governments. Furthermore, there is growing recognition of the interconnectedness of different facets of life, something long understood by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, including the inextricable links between human and planetary health.

COVID-19 has brought a new level of visibility to the health inequities facing Australians, including Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people who continue to experience unacceptably poor health outcomes. In shining a light on persistent problems, it has heightened dissatisfaction about the lack of progress to redress health inequities, and galvanised the health sector to overcome long-standing policy inertia and drive meaningful change. The pandemic has also highlighted new issues, such as the spatial inequities experienced during stay-at-home restrictions by communities and individuals who lack local amenities or adequate space for home-based learning and working, and residents of high rise apartment buildings with lifts and shared facilities that impede physical distancing.

The health sector is spurred on by these unjust differences in daily living conditions and health outcomes. As we emerge from a state of pandemic-induced disruption and flux in Australia, we have a unique opportunity to leverage the policy window and burgeoning community support for evidence-based public health action and create a post-pandemic pathway to health for all.

We know that a healthy, sustainable, equitable and prosperous Australia is possible, because we know what causes good health and wellbeing, and the foundations for action are already in place.

Health and wellbeing for current and future generations can be achieved with evidence-based action on the multiple and complex determinants of health. As set out in the supplement accompanying this issue of the MJA, bold action is required and the time for change is now. To achieve health for all by 2030, progress on the social determinants of health needs to be accelerated, and broadened to include the cultural determinants of health in order to improve the health and wellbeing of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in particular. In recognition of the inextricable link between human and planetary health, we must lift our gaze and focus more broadly on protecting all life (not just human life) and achieving intergenerational planetary health equity (rather than a narrower focus on human health equity). Strong partnerships with urban design and transport planning are important to integrate health into transport and land-use decisions and enhance the liveability of Australian cities by increasing opportunities for safe and active local living. Addressing the commercial determinants of health is long overdue but critical to ensure health always comes before profit. Strong governance to protect health from commercial interests and to redress power imbalances between corporations, Australian governments and citizens is urgently required. We must also proactively respond to rapid and exponential technological change with increased sophistication, and inclusive and ethical practice.

The foundations for action are already in place — evidence, frameworks, precedents in other sectors — and international case studies abound, as identified in the accompanying supplement.12 There is nothing holding us back and no excuses for complacency, inaction or practice not informed by evidence or based on principles of equity and sustainability.

The health sector has a key role in providing policy-relevant evidence and driving and advocating for concrete political action to meaningfully address the many determinants of health. Mobilising community support and multisectoral partnerships and action will be critical to success. Fundamental changes in the way we govern our lives and what is valued by society are required, including participatory governance to ensure an engaged civil society.

In order to achieve these profound shifts, the health sector and public health workforce must also evolve. Investment in the workforce is essential, and existing health promotion frameworks need revising to support the shifts and guide subsequent action to build back better, fairer and greener.

It is time for bold action and systemic change. We must work together to seize this opportunity to create a post-pandemic pathway to health for all by 2030.

Dr Sandro Demaio is the CEO of the Victorian Health Promotion Foundation (VicHealth). This article was originally published by the MJA. Read the original here.

3 thoughts on “Health for all by 2030: we must act now

  1. Max says:

    Such utopianism always and inevitably comes up against practical reality, especially when the cosy word ‘equity’ finally breaks cover and is seen in all its redistributive glory.

  2. Dr Peter Sanad says:

    It’s easy to write an articulate article expressing in vague terms how we can approach health care for all by a certain date. The reality is that as a nation grows universal health care becomes more costly and hence restrictive. See the NHS for a prime example.

    I am a GP in a well off suburb in Melbourne, and my patients who access the public health system often end up with sub optimal care, and I suppose that is nothing compared to public health care access for patient in remote and rural areas.

    The difference is I am not complaining about it: I recognise it to be a fundamental FEATURE of all public health systems. We could easily offer top notch universal health care, but we would need to increase the marginal tax rates a further 10% to achieve it.

    That is the real question, and there would be excellent arguments on each side. But an article posturing about “bold action” and “systemic change” and “working together” is exactly that: posturing.

  3. PK says:

    Dr Demaio, I agree with everything in your essay in principle. How do you propose to influence decision makers and regulators (where they exist) to shift their ideology from the pragmatic dogma of capitalism?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *