Opinions 15 November 2010

Jane McCredie: Nip 'n tuck that goes too far

Authored by
Jane McCredie

AS if nose jobs, boob jobs and Botox injections weren’t enough, an increasing number of women are apparently now looking to get their genitals “recontoured” in the never-ending search for bodily perfection.

The Sydney Morning Herald reported last week on a surge in demand for vaginal cosmetic surgery, something I’d heard about anecdotally.

Ted Weaver, president of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, expressed concerns about the increasing popularity of procedures such as labial reduction, telling the newspaper they should only be performed for clear indications and after proper counselling.

“They couch it in language like ‘sculpting and rejuvenation’,” he said of some clinics. “But it’s cutting and stitching. It’s not glamorous.”

Look at some of the myriad websites spruiking the procedures and you could be forgiven for thinking that having surgery on your genitals is on a par with having your legs waxed: you’ll be in and out in a couple of hours with minimal pain and inconvenience.

The Cosmetic Surgery Australia website, which includes links to doctors who perform labial reductions, does not appear to be plagued by doubts, saying: “The purpose of labiaplasty is to improve the external appearance of the vagina. After the procedure most women have less discomfort during intercourse, feel more positive about their appearance and show overall improvement in their self esteem.”

The website also had this to say about sensation in the recontoured labia: “Sexual feeling after labiaplasty depends on the degree of labia abnormality to begin with. If excess labia tissue interferes with sexual activity prior to labiaplasty, then you and your partner may notice improvement after surgery.”

Shouldn’t there be at least some mention of the risk genital surgery could actually lead to reduced rather than improved sensation?

None of this is to say labial reduction may not be clinically warranted in some women, where hypertrophy causes great physical or psychological discomfort.

But I suspect most of the procedures are performed for cosmetic reasons — out of an insecurity fuelled at least in part by increased exposure to porn and the fashion for less abundant pubic hair.

Proponents argue having your labia trimmed is no different from any other cosmetic procedure. Maybe they have an argument, though it’s one I’m struggling to accommodate.

Are there really no limits to the anxieties that can be whipped up about our various body parts?

Wouldn’t helping people feel good about the bodies they have be better than encouraging them to think fulfilment and self-esteem can be achieved via the surgeon’s scalpel?

Jane McCredie is a Sydney-based science and medicine writer. She has worked for Melbourne’s The Age and contributed to publications including the BMJ, The Australian and the Sydney Morning Herald. She is also a former news and features editor with Australian Doctor. Her book, Making girls and boys, on the science of sex and gender, will be published by UNSW Press early next year

Posted 15 November 2010

Loading comments…

Newsletters

Subscribe to the InSight+ newsletter

Immediate and free access to the latest articles

No spam, you can unsubscribe anytime you want.

By providing your information, you agree to our Access Terms and our Privacy Policy. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.