Issue 2 / 20 January 2020

I URGE the Queensland Government to address the drastic underfunding of palliative care so that Queenslanders can have the reassurance of comfort and dignity – a “good death” – when they die.

This is in the context of the current disproportionate level of focus on voluntary assisted dying which is currently being investigated by the Queensland Parliamentary Committee into Aged Care, Palliative Care and Voluntary Assisted Suicide, and which will report back in March 2020.

It is acknowledged that voluntary assisted dying laws will only be applicable to a minority. As such, Queenslanders, as well as other Australians, need to know that palliative care will be adequately resourced so that their end-of-life suffering can be – and will be – managed effectively.

In 2013, a Queensland Parliamentary Committee clearly identified that specialist palliative care services in this state were understaffed and under-resourced and did not have capacity to provide adequate community care or after-hours cover.

Six years have passed and there has been inexcusable slow progress to improve things for the ageing Queensland community. Queensland has only half the number of specialist palliative care services required to meet the community need and we must correct this as a matter of urgency.

As President of the Australian Medical Association (AMA) Queensland, I called on the state government in 2019 to significantly invest in palliative care services. Despite this, just $17 million were allocated in the 2019–20 Budget. As welcome as that was, it is nearly not enough when compared with $224 million announced in October 2019 by the Government of Western Australia.

So, what do we need?

I am calling for a complete restructure of Palliative Care Services in Queensland and now is the right time. Specialist palliative care units, appropriately resourced and staffed, need to be established in our regional and rural areas. Each of these units should be responsible for coordinating services on the ground in their geographic regions.

In addition, each major Queensland training hospital needs to have a dedicated palliative care unit with sufficient palliative care-trained specialists and beds. These specialist palliative care units would provide immediate advice to the regional and rural units in their footprints as well as train and upskill doctors, nurses and allied health staff.

I offer this “hub and spoke” model as a statewide palliative care strategy.

By working collaboratively with nursing and allied health staff, this strategy would improve the ability of doctors to live up to the AMA position statement that we “have an ethical duty to care for dying patients so that death is allowed to occur in comfort and with dignity”.

Despite mounting pressure on the Palaszczuk state government to rapidly introduce right-to-die laws, the more pressing problem for Queensland is creating a well resourced, state of the art palliative care system.

WA has become the nation’s second state to pass euthanasia legislation, just 5 months after Victoria’s laws came into effect. In addition, television personality and founder of WA pro-euthanasia lobby group Go Gentle Australia, Andrew Denton, ramped up public pressure on the Palaszczuk government when he flew to Brisbane recently to urge the Premier to introduce voluntary assisted dying legislation ahead of a state election on 31 October 2020, in the event that a conservative government is elected in Queensland.

A law as game-changing as this one – as fundamental to the notions of life and death – warrants a carefully considered study, based on the real-life experiences of people who have a need to access existing laws. Why is there such a hurry for all jurisdictions to quickly follow suit? Queensland should wait longer to allow time to assess the impact of laws in Victoria and WA. These are very complex laws and they deserve further evaluation. It will take at least 2 years to build a database of cases in Victoria and WA and evaluate whether those laws are working as per legislative requirements. We must complete this before considering similar laws in Queensland.

The question to be asked of those seeking this push for physician-assisted dying is “what are they actually seeking?” Are they wanting autonomy to die in comfort and dignity alongside their loved ones and preferably at home? If so, will they feel the same way about voluntary assisted dying laws if they had access to state of the art palliative care – when they need it and where they need it, no matter in which part of Queensland they live?

Of course, patients themselves need to accept some responsibility for planning appropriately, which comes in the form of preparing an Advanced Care Directive. This document, completed in conjunction with a GP, sets out end-of-life health care preferences. The fact that so many of us want to die at home (70%) but only 14% do so reflects our own reluctance to deal with this issue.

As an organisation, AMA Queensland believes “that laws in relation to euthanasia and physician assisted suicide are ultimately a matter for society and government”. However, should the government proceed with drafting such legislation, AMA Queensland will be seeking to influence its outcome by ensuring appropriate safeguards.

The AMA position statement is transparent and in the public domain:

“If governments decide that laws should be changed to allow for the practice of euthanasia and/or physician assisted suicide, the medical profession must be involved in the development of relevant legislation, regulations and guidelines which protect all doctors acting within the law; vulnerable patients – such as those who may be coerced or be susceptible to undue influence, or those who may consider themselves to be a burden to their families, carers or society; patients and doctors who do not want to participate; and the functioning of the health system as a whole. Any change to the laws in relation to euthanasia and/or physician assisted suicide must never compromise the provision and resourcing of end of life care and palliative care services.”

The current debate about voluntary assisted dying is a cry of desperation to the state government from Queenslanders who want to know that, when the time comes, they can die with dignity and without suffering. Voluntary assisted dying is not the answer for most Queenslanders and we should not let ourselves be distracted by the recent disproportionate focus on euthanasia laws.

The real answer is surety of palliative care services, no matter where you live. The Premier has brought this year’s budget forward to April, obviously as part of a looming election strategy. But it also provides an ideal opportunity for the state government to show all Queenslanders that it is genuinely considering their future health needs.

Dr Dilip Dhupelia is President of the Australian Medical Association Queensland.

 

The statements or opinions expressed in this article reflect the views of the authors and do not represent the official policy of the AMA, the MJA or InSight+ unless so stated.

6 thoughts on “Time is right for a statewide palliative care strategy

  1. Tracey Porst, CEO Karuna Hospice Services. says:

    Thank you for a well considered article.

    Consideration should also be given to proper funding provisions to the community palliative care sector. Our not-for-profit organisations offer choice for individuals to die peacefully and comfortable at home. This alleviates pressure on the HHS services.

  2. Dr Greg Mewett - Palliative Care Physician says:

    It is actually possible to advocate for both better palliative care funding and voluntary assisted dying at the same time.
    It is a false dichotomy to claim it is “either/or”.
    Surely arguments for or against assisted dying legislation should now be more sophisticated than falling into this old fallacy.
    Everyone is entitled to set their own ethical/moral limits on this issue but not to deny the majority view or the individual person’s limits to their own suffering.

  3. Michael Cameron says:

    Better resourced Palliative Care and Voluntary Assisted Dying can easily co-exist. A person at the end of his or her life can benefit from either, or both. Legalising VAD will provide a choice which doesn’t exist in Queensland currently, a choice which has brought great comfort to dying people and their families over the last twenty years internationally. People at end of life are usually weak and sick. They feel powerless. We must advocate for them, so they can take some control over their final days.

  4. Dr Becky Chapman Palliative Medicine Physician says:

    Dear Dr Kennedy
    ‘Voluntary assisted dying’ maybe another another word for suicide but it is not killing.
    Modern Palliative Care is not always successful, despite our best efforts.
    The implications for medicine are considerable & not to be dealt with lightly. However, denying the law will not help either.

  5. peter stephenson says:

    “The current debate about voluntary assisted dying is a cry of desperation to the state government from Queenslanders who want to know that, when the time comes, they can die with dignity and without suffering. ”

    Exactly: there is no way that palliative care, no matter how state of the art it is, can guarantee the above. It is physically impossible! So we desperately need VAD.

  6. Michael Kennedy says:

    “Voluntary assisted dying ” is another word for killing.
    With modern palliative care there is no medical indication to intentionally kill a patient.
    The implications for medicine are considerable.
    If interested read the peer reviewed article :
    “The other side of euthanasia: A practice perspective from Australia.”
    Published in:
    Research in Ethical Issues in Organizations 2019;20: 55-66

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *