Genders experience pain differently, and women have it more

More women than men suffer from chronic pain, described as pain that persists for more than six months. In addition, much of this pain remains undiagnosed or untreated.

As well as the pain associated with menstruation or the bearing of children, waiting rooms of pain physicians, rheumatologists and gastroenterologists show clear majorities of women.

Research has found the only pain conditions more common in men are the relatively infrequent cluster headaches (where strong pain occurs on one side of the head), nerve pain after shingles, ankylosing spondylitis (a form of spinal arthritis) and migraine without perceptual disturbances of light and smell (called “aura”).

Everything else – from pelvic pain, irritable bowel syndrome, all other headaches, multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, jaw pain, bladder pain syndrome, fibromyalgia, chronic regional pain syndrome to odontalgia (painful teeth) – is more common in women.

Men and women also describe pain differently. Research found women tended to use more descriptive, graphic language with a focus on sensory symptoms. Men were more likely to express anger or swear, but recalled the event more objectively.

Male subjects’ written responses were shorter and less detailed, with potential influences being gender role expectations of pain response, a male reticence to report painful sensations and feelings of embarrassment when reporting a pain experience.

History of thinking about pain

We understand pain in others best when we have real or imagined shared experience. Pain in women is frequently both unable to be visualised (unlike lacerations or other visible injuries) and outside the experience of their health professional.

How to view the female patient with pain that can’t be seen is a problem the Ancient Greeks pondered as early as 400 BC. Faced with a complex range of suffering and complaints in women, Ancient Greek physicians came up with a novel explanation: the “wandering womb”. The womb was believed to move upward in a woman’s body whenever it became hot and dry, searching for cool moist places, and causing stress and damage to her physical and mental well-being.

Hippocrates (460-370 BC) used the term “hysteria”, which derives from the Greek word “hysteros” for “womb”, to describe a wide variety of female emotional and physical conditions. By inference this labelled women in pain as weak, inferior or irrational. Parallel to their inferior social position in Ancient Greece, Aristotle (384-322) used the concept of hysteria in his book, The Nicomachean Ethics, as proof that women were unsuitable for public office.

Genders experience pain differently, and women have it more - Featured Image

There’s a common belief that women have a higher pain threshold so they can give birth, but actually men’s pain threshold is higher.

While such beliefs seem far-fetched today, the diagnosis of “hysteria” continued to be commonly used in European medical practice to describe a wide variety of symptoms in women for the next 2,000 years. Only in 1980 was it removed from the DSM III Manual of Psychiatric Disorders.

Unlike women, historical accounts of men’s pain have been influenced by their ability to withstand injuries incurred in warfare. As English poet William Cowper (1792) noted, incitements including “renown and glory” helped men disregard pain on the battlefield.

Research in pain

In 1977, with concern about the risk that new drugs might have on an undiagnosed pregnancy, the US Food and Drug Administration recommended that all women who were capable of becoming pregnant be excluded from drug trials. The presumption was that pain research in men would be applicable to both genders. While well intentioned, the consequence of this decision has been that the majority of pain research has been undertaken in male humans or male rodents.

This decision has since been reversed, and research into pain differences between the sexes has dramatically increased. While results have at times been conflicting, what we are learning is that females consistently show lower pain thresholds and increased pain following a painful stimulus than males. This doesn’t mean women are weaker than men or their pain isn’t real, but they feel pain more intensely than men.

Pains specifically associated with women, such as menstrual pain, may predispose women to feeling pain more acutely in other areas. Women’s brains produce less endorphin (which inhibits pain) following a pain stimulus than men. Yet when morphine is given to treat pain, it generally works equally well in either gender.

Clearly there is still a lot to learn about gender and pain. Newer thinking suggests that pain in men and women may even occur through entirely different mechanisms and pain pathways.

For example, microglia are cells from the immune system involved in chronic pain. Research in mice has shown that drugs that prevent activation of microglia are effective in reducing pain in male, but not female, mice.

So, the observed differences in ability to withstand acute pain on a battlefield (traditionally associated with males) and ability to withstand the pain of chronic disease (more commonly associated with females) may prove to have a physiological basis.

Every one of our cells knows whether we are male or female and responds accordingly. That there are differences between male and female pain should not be surprising.

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article. This article is part of a series focusing on Pain. Read other articles in the series here.

Other doctorportal blogs

[Comment] Women’s, children’s, and adolescents’ health needs universal health coverage

The 2030 Sustainable Development Goals show an ambitious global commitment to health: more holistic than the Millennium Development Goals in terms of health needs, underpinned by universal health coverage (UHC), and intended to leave no one behind.1 This new approach is also reinforced by the Every Woman Every Child Global Strategy for Women’s, Children’s and Adolescents’ Health (2016–2030) with its survive, thrive, and transform objectives, together with a target to achieve UHC.2

[Editorial] Adolescent health: boys matter too

It has been a good year for adolescents. Many global health reports and initiatives now mention adolescents. So also does the latest UN Population Fund’s State of the World Population 2015 report, released on Dec 3. Shelter from the Storm: a transformative agenda for women and girls in a crisis-prone world reminds us that there are 26 million women and adolescent girls in their childbearing years in need of humanitarian assistance worldwide. During the past 2 years or so, adolescents have been increasingly included in the women’s and child health agenda, culminating in UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon’s updated Global Strategy for Women’s and Children’s Health into the Global Strategy for Women’s, Children’s and Adolescents’ Health (2016–2030), presented on Sept 26 at the General Assembly.

GPs in ‘unique position’ to help domestic violence victims

On International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women, GPs are being reminded of their unique position at being one of the first people a victim may turn to.

RACGP President Dr Frank R Jones said GPs need to understand the nature of violence and abuse to help break the cycle.

“This includes identifying predisposing risk factors, understanding early signs and symptoms and managing the devastating consequences of family violence.”

The RACGP is one of a group of Australia’s peak medical bodies that have joined forces to help end domestic violence.

22 Colleges and peak health bodies issued a joint statement saying they will be wearing white ribbons in their workplaces and they will ‘indicate their willingness and availability to discuss this sensitive and difficult issue, should they be experiencing violence in their lives.’

Domestic violence tools

The RACGP’s white book Abuse and violence: working with our patients in general practice gives doctors evidence-based guideline on identifying domestic violence and how to respond. This edition also offers new insights into Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people as well as migrant, refugee and rural communities.
The National Sexual Assault, Domestic Family Violence Counselling Service 1800RESPECT last week launched a new toolkit to help GPs better recognise the signs of assault and empower them to respond. Visit 1800RESPECT to order your kit.
The AMA/Law Council of Australia document Supporting Patients Experiencing Family Violence kit contains information about specialist support services, including health, mental health, drug and alcohol, legal, family support and child protection services.
Victim support services and further reading on the AMA website.

Latest news:

[Perspectives] Deeds not words

John Carey’s book The Intellectuals and the Masses reminds us that many upper-class liberals of the early 20th century thought that working class and people of colour were fundamentally inferior. Well aware of the trope “posh ladies in hats”, instead of focusing on suffragette leader Emmeline Pankhurst, the makers of Suffragette tell the story of women who work in a laundry as they chart the struggle for women’s voting rights.

[Comment] Offline: Why science should matter more to global health

A brief experiment in global health comes to an end this week. On Sept 26, the iERG (the thankfully short acronym given to the independent Expert Review Group on Information and Accountability for Women’s and Children’s Health) hands its fourth and final report to WHO’s Director-General, Margaret Chan. The iERG is a creation of the Commission on Information and Accountability for Women’s and Children’s Health (CoIA). CoIA was, in turn, the product of Ban Ki-moon’s signature global health initiative, Every Woman Every Child.

[The Lancet Commissions] Women and Health: the key for sustainable development

Girls’ and women’s health is in transition and, although some aspects of it have improved substantially in the past few decades, there are still important unmet needs. Population ageing and transformations in the social determinants of health have increased the coexistence of disease burdens related to reproductive health, nutrition, and infections, and the emerging epidemic of chronic and non-communicable diseases (NCDs). Simultaneously, worldwide priorities in women’s health have themselves been changing from a narrow focus on maternal and child health to the broader framework of sexual and reproductive health and to the encompassing concept of women’s health, which is founded on a life-course approach.

[Perspectives] Ana Langer: global leader in women’s health

Ana Langer, leader of the Women and Health Initiative (W&HI) at the Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, is the first to admit that there have been major advances in women’s health in the past decade, notably in maternal and reproductive health. But she is also clear about what she calls “the unfinished agenda of women’s health”. That agenda is powerfully articulated in the Lancet Commission on Women and Health, of which Langer is the lead author. “A key question the Commission seeks to address is why health systems are repeatedly failing women when women are the main users of, and providers of, health care”, she says.

[Comment] Valuing the health and contribution of women is central to global development

During my mother’s four pregnancies, her health was viewed as a way to improve the wellbeing of her children. Between the time that my mother had her children and I had mine, more attention was paid to the health of women themselves—and particularly their survival. This concern with maternal health and survival, especially for women in low-income countries, led to the launch of the Safe Motherhood Initiative in 1987, the first global effort to focus the world’s attention on maternal health. Since then, women’s health has expanded to encompass sexual and reproductive health and, more recently, the complex interplay of factors throughout the life course, which are explored in the Lancet Commission on Women and Health.

[Comment] Making women count

Women and health, not women’s health. The distinction is important. It is important because unless the contribution women make to society is recognised, the new post-2015 global goal of sustainability will be little more than a distant utopia. The idea of women and health therefore carries some urgency. The reproductive rights of women are too often marginalised in global health, especially the rights and needs of adolescent girls and older women. But the argument of this Lancet Commission on Women and Health1 is that the global health and development community needs to go beyond sexual and reproductive health and rights.