Pioneering tuberculosis researcher. He was born in Oxford, UK, on Sept 6, 1919, and died following a bilateral pulmonary embolism in Kingston, UK, on July 2, 2018, aged 98 years.
1138
Pioneering tuberculosis researcher. He was born in Oxford, UK, on Sept 6, 1919, and died following a bilateral pulmonary embolism in Kingston, UK, on July 2, 2018, aged 98 years.
BY AMA PRESIDENT DR TONY BARTONE
The Federal Government recently announced the formation of a new taskforce consisting of relevant health care providers, researchers, clinicians, and all levels of government to combat HTLV-1 in remote Indigenous communities.
Human T-cell lymphotropic virus (HTLV) – an oncogenic virus first discovered in 1979, and the first retrovirus to be discovered – predominantly affects CD4+T cells, which play an important role in the body’s immune system.
HTLV-1 infects up to 20 million people globally, with the virus prevalent in south-western Japan and the developing countries of the Caribbean basin, South Americ, and sub-Saharan Africa.
HTLV-1 was first detected in 1988 in Central Australia in the Indigenous population, and recent studies indicate that 45 per cent of Indigenous adults who reside in remote communities in Central Australia have been infected with HTLV-1.
Commonly transmitted through contaminated blood, unprotected sex, and breast milk, the virus is associated with a fatal haematological malignancy – Adult T cell Leukemia/Lymphoma (ATLL) – and inflammatory diseases involving organs including the spinal cord, eyes, and lungs.
In Indigenous Australians, the most typical clinical manifestation of HTLV-1 is bronchiectasis (a condition in which the airways of the lungs become damaged).
The extent and seriousness of the disease is dependent on the viral load in the blood stream.
Uveitis (inflammation of the middle layer of tissue in the eye) is another serious complication of HTLV-1, which was found through a case study done in Central Australia.
It can result in blindness, so it is important for treating professionals to be well informed about HTLV-1.
Unfortunately, there are no treatments currently available for HTLV-1 infection, but the following prevention strategies could result in the reduction of transmission and, ultimately, the eradication of the virus:
The AMA supports an enhanced focus on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people at risk of blood-borne viruses, including specific resourcing of management and research to address HTLV-1.
This is consistent with the AMA’s active participation in the Close the Gap strategy, and our series of Indigenous Health Report Cards, which have highlighted diseases such as rheumatic heart disease and otitis media, and which later this year will provide an audit of success or failure in Indigenous health policy over the past decade.
On top of this, the AMA supports other policies and initiatives that aim to reduce preventable diseases, many of which have an unacceptably high prevalence in remote Indigenous communities.
The AMA remains committed to working in partnership with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander groups to advocate for Government investment and cohesive and coordinated strategies to improve health outcomes for Indigenous people.
The same Russians trolls who interfered with the US election are also spreading misinformation about vaccines, according to research from Washington DC.
Scientists at George Washington University have recently released a study in which they found Russian trolls and bots flooding Twitter and other social media outlets as part of the immunisation debate.
The discovery was made while the scientists were researching ways to improve communication methods for American health workers.
They were amazed to find extensive deliberate misleading content being spewed online in attempts to skew the debate and dissuade consensus over vaccinations.
Further digging uncovered that several false online accounts belong to the same Russian trolls who meddled with the 2016 US election. Malware bots were also being used.
But, in further evidence of deliberate efforts to confuse the situation, the trolls tweeted both pro- and anti-vaccine content, according to the researchers.
“The vast majority of Americans believe vaccines are safe and effective, but looking at Twitter gives the impression that there is a lot of debate,” said Assistant Professor David Broniatowski of GWU.
“It turns out that many anti-vaccine tweets come from accounts whose provenance is unclear. These might be bots, human users or cyborgs – hacked accounts that are sometimes taken over by bots. Although it’s impossible to know exactly how many tweets were generated by bots and trolls, our findings suggest that a significant portion of the online discourse about vaccines may be generated by malicious actors with a range of hidden agendas.
“We started looking at the Russian trolls, because that data set became available in January. One of the first things that came out was they tweet about vaccines way more often than the average Twitter user.”
The research states that trolls tweeted on vaccines about 22 times more often than regular Twitter users.
A random sample of 1.7million tweets was collected between July 2014 and September 2017 was examined. Non-vaccination rates of children in the US is climbing.
Some of the misinformation – and deliberate lies – that are being tweeted talk of “vaccine damaged children” and a “secret government database”. Other tweets link the debate to God, race, and even animal welfare.
Click baits were also used, encouraging social media users to click on advertisements and other content, only to be diverted to malicious messaging about immunisation.
Earlier this year, Twitter deleted 3,800 accounts linked to the Russian government-backed Internet Research Agency, which is the same group researchers at GWU examined.
The researchers didn’t examine Facebook, but in the face of damming criticisms this year of the social media giant’s operations, it removed 135 accounts in April linked to the Internet Research Agency.
More recently, Facebook removed another 650 fake accounts linked to Russia and Iran that appear to have be set up purely to spread misinformation.
The study is published in the American Journal of Public Health.
“Over the course of the next few decades, the availability of cheap, efficient DNA sequencing technology will lead to a medical landscape in which each baby’s genome is sequenced, and that information is used to shape a lifetime of personalized strategies for disease prevention, detection, and treatment”, said Francis Collins—the current director of the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) in 2014. However, after a 4-year research process funded by NIH, such optimism is not shared in the latest report—Sequencing Newborns: A Call for Nuanced Use of Genomic Technologies—released by The Hastings Center, a US-based, non-partisan, bioethics think tank, last month.
Few instances of a single act of legislation have shifted industrial policy in the pharmaceutical industry like the Orphan Drugs Act did when it was signed in the USA in 1983. The Act was written to facilitate the development of drugs for rare diseases and health conditions,1 and the incentives provided by the Act, such as 7 year exclusivity, tax credits of up to 50% of research and development costs, and access to research and development grants, resulted in the US Food and Drug Administration2 (FDA) approving 575 drugs and biological products for rare diseases between 1983 and 2017—a real success.
We read with interest Kimberly Whitehead and Matthew Beaumont’s Perspective1 (June 16, p 2408). As clinicians and researchers working on insomnia over the past three decades, we can only agree that the cultural and historical conditions under which insomnia occurs indeed shape the condition. However, we would like to stress that today’s psychological therapies for insomnia2 go far beyond sleep hygiene as stated in the perspective. Cognitive behavioural treatment for insomnia (CBT-I) has evolved as a mainstay of modern insomnia treatment, encompassing sleep hygiene; education about sleep; relaxation techniques; behavioural techniques, such as stimulus control and sleep restriction; and cognitive techniques to reduce nocturnal ruminations.
This is a parody of clinical trial research: an investigator (usually a man) drafts a protocol; this is not particularly demanding and, indeed, for National Institute for Health Research-funded trials, the commissioner does almost all of the thinking; the investigator then passes the protocol to a trial manager (usually a woman), who then has the extraordinarily demanding task of turning his words into reality.
Documents published by the UK Government give an insight into what a so-called no-deal Brexit would mean for medicine, research, and pharmaceutical industries. Talha Burki reports.
Identifying exact populations vulnerable to the most severe outcomes of snakebite envenoming at a subnational level is important for prioritising new data collection and collation, reinforcing envenoming treatment, existing health-care systems, and deploying currently available and future interventions. These maps can guide future research efforts on snakebite envenoming from both ecological and public health perspectives and better target future estimates of the burden of this neglected tropical disease.
Millions of patients with obstructive coronary artery disease worldwide are treated with metallic stents each year. Since the first stent implantation in a human in 1986, stents have undergone substantial refinements that have involved numerous innovations and extensive clinical research.1 Over three decades, various problems were faced and solved or minimised. Among them were the frequent acute and sub-acute thrombotic occlusions of the very first stents, the recurrence of difficult-to-treat lesions within bare metal stents (typically within the first 6 months after implantation), and the late (1–12 months after implantation) and very late (>1 year after implantation) formation of thrombi in the first generation of drug-eluting stents.