×

BOOK REVIEW

The Happy Bowel
Dr Michael Levitt
Fremantle Press
RRP: $24.99

 

Reviewed by Chris Johnson

June is Bowel Cancer Awareness Month, an annual initiative of Bowel Cancer Australia.

The aim is to use the month to highlight that although bowel cancer is Australia’s second deadliest cancer, from which more than 80 Australians die every week, it is also one of the most treatable cancers if detected early.

Dr Michael Levitt MBBS, FRACS is not acting as part of the awareness month, but through Fremantle Press in Western Australia has released a timely book about looking after the bowel.

A fundraiser launch will raise money for bowel cancer research.

The Happy Bowel is not a book about bowel cancer by any means. It is, as its sub-title states, a user-friendly guide to bowel health for the whole family.

Because, when push comes to shove, there is nothing as fundamental as a well-functioning bowel.

That’s Dr Levitt’s view and this easy-to-read 190-page offering decisively makes that case and is as entertaining as it is informative.

A respected surgeon, Dr Levitt has restored hundreds of patients to bowel health and happiness, and is acclaimed as a leading authority on bowel disorders.

He is a colorectal surgeon who won a Centenary Medal in 2003 in recognition of his work raising public awareness and understanding of colorectal cancer. He is also the director of St John of God Healthcare and the chairman of the Colorectal Cancer Research Fund Advisory Committee.

The Happy Bowel addresses questions from how the bowel works, the relationship between the bowel and the brain, bowels and gender difference and the relationship between our habits and beliefs and good bowel function.

It looks at what to do when fibre, water and exercise are not enough, and it includes case studies and a comprehensive FAQs section. In the process, Dr Levitt answers patients’ most pressing questions and he reveals some golden rules for getting the best out of your bowel.

Promoted as an essential resource for all practitioners’ waiting rooms, it seems an excellent way to educate patients in good bowel function and help them learn more about their bowel health.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Department of Error] Department of Error

Abu Taha A, Daoud A, Zaid S, Sammour S, Belleh M, Daifi R. Active surveillance for asymptomatic colonisation by multidrug-resistant bacteria in patients transferred to a tertiary care hospital in the occupied Palestinian territory. Lancet 2018; 391 (Research in the Occupied Palestinian Territory 2017 special issue): S2—In this Abstract, the source of funding has been corrected to An-Najah National University. This correction has been made to the online version as of March 14, 2018.

[Perspectives] Désirée van der Heijde: a focus on outcomes in rheumatic diseases

When researching the progress of rheumatoid arthritis and related conditions, many rheumatologists will have used the Sharp/van der Heijde scoring system for measuring radiographically observed damage. The first half of that eponym denotes John Sharp, the American rheumatologist who devised and published the scale in 1985 with a view to measuring the effectiveness of disease-modifying drugs. Sharp died in 2008, but Désirée van der Heijde, the Dutch rheumatologist who modified Sharp’s original system, is alive and well and Professor of Rheumatology at Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC) in the Netherlands.

Excellent choice for Excellence in Healthcare Award

The recipient of the AMA Excellence in Healthcare Award 2018 wants to know how she can use it to build greater awareness for a very worthy cause.

Professor Elizabeth Elliott AM FAHMS was presented with her award by outgoing AMA President, Dr Michael Gannon, at the AMA National Conference in Canberra in May.

Professor Elliott is a pioneer in research, clinical care, and advocacy for Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) and was named the winner of the AMA Excellence in Healthcare Award 2018 during the opening session of the Conference.

FASD is caused by prenatal alcohol exposure and is recognised as the leading preventable cause of prenatal brain injury, birth defects, and developmental and learning disability worldwide. There are lifelong consequences for children born from alcohol-exposed pregnancies.

The AMA Excellence in Healthcare Award is for an individual, not necessarily a doctor or AMA member, who has made a significant contribution to improving health or health care in Australia. The person may be involved in health awareness, health policy, or health delivery.

Professor Elliott was nominated for the award by the National Organisation for Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (NOFASD), the first and largest organisation dedicated to FASD in Australia.

Over the past 20 years, FASD has evolved from being a little-known, poorly recognised, and misunderstood condition to becoming a major strategic focus for Commonwealth and State Health Departments.

“I am really delighted to be acknowledged, but I really accept the award on behalf of all the children and families I work with, and of course a lot of dedicated clinicians,” she told Australian Medicine.

“I guess for me it’s particularly nice that the group that nominated me was the national organisation.

“I read something that said this was an opportunity to highlight this cause so I’m very keen to find out how to use the AMA network to raise awareness.

“We need to raise awareness of (1) the fact that are still lots of women who drink during their pregnancy not knowing they might harm their unborn child, and (2) there are lots of doctors who are very reluctant to ask pregnant mothers about their drinking.

“They don’t want to upset the doctor-patient relationship, and yet women tell us they want to be asked. They want clear advice. In fact many of them tell us they want to be told not to drink during pregnancy. They want a clear message from doctors.”

Professor Elliott is a Distinguished Professor in Paediatrics and Health at The University of Sydney School of Medicine and a NHMRC Practitioner Fellow. She has been a passionate advocate for raising awareness of FASD for more than 20 years.

In presenting her the award, Dr Gannon said Professor Elliott played a significant leadership role in developing the Australian Guide to the Diagnosis of FASD and online training modules, new clinical services, a national FASD website, and a national FASD register.

“She chaired the Australian Government’s National FASD Technical Network and is Co-Chair of the NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in FASD, and Head of the NSW FASD Assessment service,” Dr Gannon said.

“She was lead clinician in the Lililwan study on FASD prevalence in the Fitzroy Valley and has published extensively on FASD.

“She contributed to WHO, NHMRC, and RACP alcohol guidelines and has been a keynote, invited, or scientific presenter at more than 300 conferences nationally and internationally.

 “Professor Elliott is a true pioneer in the FASD field and has contributed to the development of Australia’s response to FASD, through addressing aspects of health policy, health care delivery, education, and health awareness in the work she has undertaken.

“However, FASD is only one component of Professor Elliott’s work, which includes disadvantaged children in Immigration detention, with rare disorders, and living in remote Australia.

“In 2008, she was made a Member of the Order of Australia (AM) for services to paediatrics and child health and, in 2017, she received the Howard Williams Medal from the Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP) – its highest award – for her contribution to paediatrics in Australia and New Zealand.

“Much of her work has been undertaken voluntarily, and has strengthened Australia’s health systems and their capacity to respond to FASD.

“Her efforts have improved health care services in FASD and changed health outcomes for children and families living with, and affected by, FASD.

“She is a worthy recipient of the AMA Excellence in Healthcare Award.”

CHRIS JOHNSON

 

 

 

 

 

[Correspondence] Daytime variations in perioperative myocardial injury

We read with interest the Article by David Montaigne and colleagues1 reporting that among patients having on-pump cardiac surgery for aortic valve replacement, the time of day that surgery is done might affect their tolerance to ischaemia–reperfusion injury. The results are intriguing and we commend the researchers for their comprehensive translational study.

War zone gynaecologist named AMA Woman in Medicine

AMA Woman in Medicine 2018, Professor Judith Goh AO, has described receiving her award as a great honour and privilege.

Adding that it was acknowledgement for the work of a dedicated team of health professionals, Professor Goh told Australian Medicine the award would also help build awareness for the plight of women’s health.

“We often live quite comfortably in Australia but for most women around the world, surviving their pregnancy is not taken for granted,” she said.

“So this is great recognition. But we don’t do these things to be recognised. We do it because we want to do it.”

Professor Goh is a dedicated gynaecologist who volunteers her time treating women in war zones and Third World countries.

She was named the AMA Woman in Medicine 2018 at the AMA National Conference in May.

She is a urogynaecologist who has devoted her career to women’s health. Her next stops are Bangladesh, Myanmar, and some African countries.

A world-renowned surgeon who has spent approximately three months every year for the past 23 years training doctors in Third World countries in repairing vesico-vaginal fistula – a devastating injury that can occur following prolonged, obstructive labour – Professor Goh was noticeably touched by the honour.

In presenting her the award, outgoing AMA President Dr Michael Gannon noted that Professor Goh’s nominators – colleagues from the Australian Federation of Medical Women and the Queensland Medical Women’s Society – have described her career as both humbling and inspirational.

“Since 1995, Professor Goh has donated her time and expertise, working abroad several times a year as a volunteer fistula surgeon in many parts of Africa and Asia, including Bangladesh, Sierra Leone, Ethiopia, Tanzania, Uganda, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and Liberia,” Dr Gannon said.

“Professor Goh runs the twin projects, Medical Training in Africa and Medical Training in Asia, via the charity, Health and Development Aid Abroad (HADA), using funds raised to help pay for women’s surgeries such as the correction of genital tract fistulae and prolapse, while training the local staff in these areas.

“To carry out her work within a dedicated team of professionals, Professor Goh often has to brave political unrest, and perform surgery in challenging environments, as well as deal with the emotional and social injuries to her patients due to war, rape, domestic violence, poverty, shame, and grief.

“Her work has changed lives for the better for hundreds of affected women, correcting their often long-standing and preventable obstetric trauma, including vesico-vaginal and recto-vaginal fistulae, with the minimum of overhead costs to maximise the reach of her services.

“Professor Goh uses her time abroad to upskill local practitioners in this area of medicine, and to raise awareness of the underlying causes of chronic complications of birth trauma, including poverty, lack of education, lack of awareness, and the subordination of women in some cultures.

“In 2012, she was made an Officer of the Order of Australia (AO) ‘for distinguished service to gynaecological medicine, particularly in the area of fistula surgery, and to the promotion of the rights of women and children in developing countries’.

“Her humble dedication within this field of women’s medicine, and her brave and generous service to women all over the world, is inspirational, and very worthy of recognition as a recipient of the AMA Woman in Medicine Award.”

Professor Goh said many women felt ashamed after delivering stillborn babies.

“In some places it is seen as a failure. There is even violence against them in some communities. We are building a community where lot of women can come together and feel supported,” she said.

“In our country we no longer really say ‘mother and child are well’ after a baby is born. It’s taken for granted, so the first question is how much did the baby weigh.

“But there are so many places in the world where this cannot be taken for granted.”

The AMA Woman in Medicine Award is presented to a woman who has made a major contribution to the medical profession by showing ongoing commitment to quality care, or through her contribution to medical research, public health projects, or improving the availability and accessibility of medical education and medical training for women.

CHRIS JOHNSON

AMSA President delivers confronting speech

Between the votes for AMA President and AMA Vice President at National Conference, AMSA President Alex Farrell eloquently delivered a powerful address that captivated all in attendance. Among the topics she focused on were gender equity, sexism, racism, harassment, and mental health. Conference delegates gave her a standing ovation.

Below is a transcript her address.

Hello, my name is Alex, and I’m the President of the Australian Medical Students’ Association.

I would like to acknowledge the Ngunnawal people who are the traditional custodians of this land and pay respect to the Elders of the Ngunnawal Nation, past, present, and emerging.

Thank you to the AMA, not only for the chance to address you today, but for the ongoing support you’ve shown AMSA and all Australian medical students.

On my first day of medical school, we were asked to look on either side of us. It was a fun guessing game, which of us three would develop mental illnesses as part of our course.

A few months later, I first became involved in AMSA because, as a student starting to see the broken parts of our system, it seemed to be where stuff got done. Doctors, and by extension medical students, hold a trusted place in society, and I saw AMSA bringing us together so we could use our collective political capital for actual outcomes. Realising that students’ voices mattered in the conversation, and through groups like AMSA and the AMA I could contribute to real change, was incredibly empowering. It was also daunting, because we still have a lot to work on.

Where our organisations speak out, people listen. Students will remember the AMA joining us in the fight for marriage equality for a long time to come. It was a powerful signal to the Australian community that doctors support our queer patients and peers, at a time when many were hurting. It mattered.

The AMA speaking out on the health of refugees on Manus and Nauru mattered.

That is quite the responsibility. Here in this room, you are the people who will continue to set the AMA’s vision and messages going forward. Often that will be on issues affecting the health of all Australians. For today, I want to look a little closer to home, at medical culture.

I am often told that when it comes to changing culture, students are the way forward. This year I’ve sat in countless meetings where reassurances have been given that our problems will be solved, because the younger generation will eventually reach the top, and we have the mindset to create ‘the change’.

The medical students of Australia are extraordinary. But that is a huge burden to place on our shoulders alone, without the structures to support us. We have the least power, and often the most to lose.

‘Generational change’ is a myth when the problems lie in a system that the upcoming generations are still trained to conform to. They will continue to perpetuate that culture, unless it is actively disrupted.

We need support from you, doctors who have power in the system to help us change it.

I’ve been lucky enough to spend this year listening to students and hearing their stories. I’m here representing an exceptional group with diverse backgrounds and experiences.

Medical school has never been without its difficulties. While some may have shifted for the better since your training years, in other ways we face new challenges, and old challenges we hoped would have disappeared.

Challenges in gender equity, and diversity in leadership, in mental health and mistreatment in medical education, and in the growing training pressures that we’ll face on graduation.

To begin, gender inequity is alive and well in medicine today. It covers a spectrum of sexist behaviour, from well-meaning but gendered comments, to clearly abhorrent harassment and assault.

You heard yesterday about the very real barriers women in medicine face on a daily basis. The invasive interview questions, the pregnancy discrimination, the pay gap.

This starts in medical school. Every female student will recall a time they were told to avoid specialties that aren’t ‘family friendly’. I’ve spoken to students told that “there’s no point teaching them how to suture, because they are just going to become a GP anyway”. To a student whose supervisor was well known to either bully or flirt with their female students, and told she was lucky to be picked for the latter.

It’s what we call unconscious bias. Women and men alike, not meaning to, doubt women’s abilities just that much more. Women need to work harder to prove themselves, because they don’t fit the leadership image we all expect to see, whether that’s in an operating theatre or hospital board room. It’s not really about gender or sex, it is about power and authority, and who we see holding it.

Women are under-represented in nearly every position of medical leadership. They are far less likely to be medical school deans, chief executives of hospitals, receive research grants, or be AMA Presidents. They are less quickly promoted, less well paid.

The truth is, most doctors involved in the lower levels of sexism and harassment aren’t malicious. They may think they are being helpful, or flattering, or telling a harmless joke. Many never actually receive feedback that they are being inappropriate. And so the behaviour builds, and the lack of accountability builds, and for the few with bad intentions, the opportunities to abuse power also build up.

As we tolerate less confronting comments, we pave the way for them to escalate unchecked.Everyday sexism looks benign, but it has shaped what medicine looks like, from our first year university students, all the way up to the people here today.

In the past couple of years, medicine in Australia has been rocked by the revelation of endemic harassment. I don’t think anyone will be truly surprised when the next horrible event breaks. We haven’t changed enough to expect them to stop. But it’s not enough to wait till then to be shocked back into action. There’s no more room for apathy in this space.

The same goes for all vulnerable population groups. There are exceptional Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander medical students but, compared to other students, the barriers to graduating can pile up.

Earlier this year, I was able to speak to the student representatives of the Australian Indigenous Doctors’ Association, AIDA, and hear their stories of daily stereotyping and racist comments, of being regularly told they had taken the place of someone who actually deserved to be in medicine.

A survey by AIDA has found that nearly 50 per cent of our Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander doctors face bullying, racism or violence a few times a month, or even daily.

While more and more, the makeup of medical students reflects our population, this isn’t reaching the tiers of leadership where the ability to really create change lies.

The hurdles to being leaders and advocates are only escalated when certain groups are less valued and protected in the medical sphere.

For students and doctors in training, the health industry is hierarchical and rigid. Challenging norms simply isn’t safe territory. We know that most students mistreated during their medical training don’t report it, for two key reasons. They don’t know how, and they’re afraid of what might happen if they do speak up.

When asked to elaborate, these are their responses:

“We are taught from our first year that whistle blowing in medicine is career suicide”

“My supervisor could be my examiner”

“I tried – the university told me it was the hospital’s responsibility, the hospital directed me back to the university’

“It doesn’t look good for getting into a specialty program”

Even as someone who has spent this year speaking out on this issue, when I go back into clinical rotations next year, I can’t say with confidence that I’ll report bullying or harassment if it happens to me. I, as so many students are, am worried about what might happen on the wards, but I’m even more worried about what might happen with a report.

Which means that responsibility to speak up lies with you. To take colleagues aside if they might be crossing lines. To create systems in hospitals where reporting doesn’t put students and staff at risk. To demand tangible consequences.

We can change the structure that drives medical culture. We need only look at the issue of mental health, to see this community rally, and say ‘enough is enough’.

The promises from COAG to change mandatory reporting laws to remove barriers for health professionals to seek appropriate treatment for mental health are proof of that. That came from sustained and powerful advocacy, from students and the AMA.

The work is far from done, but as a start I’m hoping I can look forward to not hearing any more stories of students being told that seeing a GP will end their career.

It won’t solve all the culprits behind poor student mental health. As students we are staring down the barrel of the building pressure of vocational training – there are far more of us graduating than there are specialty training places, and by the time it is our turn to apply, it will be reaching crisis point.

Knowing that is the future for us, it should come as no surprise that students are doing anything we can to get ahead. Research projects in the holidays, Masters degrees in parallel with full-time medicine and part-time jobs. We can talk about work-life balance as much as we would like, but while this is the status quo, mental health will suffer.

Once out in the workforce, many of us will take years off clinical practice for PHDs or other pieces of paper to make us better candidates, but not necessarily better doctors. We will follow the signals that Colleges and the Profession send us – for a focus on clinical education and service, like so many of you yesterday placed as a priority, they need to be recognised accordingly.

When it comes to mental health, there is one area where students and senior doctors still seem to often not see eye to eye – resilience.

For us, resilience has become a dirty word. That’s not because we don’t believe in prioritising mental wellness. It’s a word that has been overused, at the worst times. Resilience is a suicidal friend pointed towards mindfulness courses. It takes students at the darkest point, and tells them they just should have been stronger. It acknowledges that the medical training environment is flawed, but at the same time says that the answer is fixing students, rather than seeking larger change. That is what students hear.  

So instead, let’s talk about what they are being resilient against.

Sixty per cent of medical students have witnessed mistreatment in medical education. That’s two in every three. Most the time, this comes as belittlement, condescension or humiliation.

Women are more likely to be mistreated in medical education than men, queer students more than heterosexual, clinical students more than pre-clinical. Consultants are the main offenders in half of the cases.

In the medical world, we are expected to teach and lead as a core part of our work. Doctors spend years learning to practise medicine, but are expected to teach with no training at all.

Your actions matter to the students in front of you in that moment, but also for what they role model going forward. We replicate the examples that were shown to us in our training – so the way you teach now will shape what the medical profession looks in 20 years. If you want to see things change, that is the first place to start.

As a teacher, role model safe practice, good communication, work-life balance. A positive culture is a safe culture.

I know it is not always easy.  As students we take time away from your busy days. Sometimes we don’t know how to help, and know that our gaps in knowledge fall short of your expectations. All students know the feeling of being a burden on their team. But to learn, we need to be in the room, and able to ask those questions.

Medical students want to work hard, and to be good, safe doctors.

You hold the power to impact the lives of your students each and every day. That’s not to say they need to be your first priority. Your patients always come first. But it doesn’t have to be one or the other. It only takes a moment to say good job, or to answer a question, or explain how to improve next time.

That moment can make your student’s day. It can keep their love for medicine going, through all the other parts of this profession that may otherwise leave us disillusioned far too soon.

Thank you to all of you here who make that effort to be positive mentors and teachers. You are appreciated.

I believe that we can build a medical culture that is safe and nurturing. But it can’t wait 20 years, when my peers are filling these seats. It has to start now, and it has to come from the top. In the way you teach, in the way you lead, and in the systems you influence, be part of that change, and I promise, we will do you proud.

 

Government funds new hub for mental health

The Federal Government has launched a new research hub focused on preventing anxiety and depression.

To be known as the Prevention Hub, it is a collaboration between the Black Dog Institute and Everymind. It will receive $5 million in Government funding to bring together research, clinical education and policy experts to work on prevention strategies.

The Hub will implement and evaluate preventive strategies for anxiety and depression across three settings – workplace, education and healthcare.

The workplace strategies will include rolling out and testing online mental health tools and e-mental health and peer support programs to reduce mental health problems in the workplace.

Education strategies will focus on children, teenagers and their families by increasing the capability of educators and providing online prevention screening and referral tools.

Healthcare strategies will include an extension of an online screening mental health platform for GPs and the development of a framework to improve the mental health of our medical workforce.

Health Minister Greg Hunt said funding for the Hub was a continuation of the Government’s efforts to make mental health a priority.

An additional $338 million was allocated to mental health in this year’s Budget.

“This includes $73 million for suicide prevention to directly help people struggling with mental health challenges and more than $120 million for mental health research,” Mr Hunt said.

“Mental illness does not discriminate and is far more prevalent than most people realise. Nearly half of all Australians will experience mental illness in their lifetime. About one million adult Australians suffer from depression.

“Research has shown around 20 per cent of all cases of depression and anxiety could be prevented by delivering evidence-based prevention programs.

“This could potentially prevent thousands of cases of depression and anxiety each year.”

CHRIS JOHNSON

 

WHO public health awards for Western Pacific Region

Public health champions from the World Health Organization (WHO) Western Pacific Region were recognised at the 71st World Health Assembly in Geneva, Switzerland.

Dr Nazni Wasi Ahmad from Malaysia received honours for her innovative research using insects to treat people with diabetes, and the Korea Institute of Drug Safety and Risk Management (KIDS) for contributions to drug safety in the country.

“Dr Nazni Wasi Ahmad and the Korea Institute of Drug Safety and Risk Management have made outstanding contributions to public health in our Region,” said Dr Shin Young-soo, WHO Regional Director for the Western Pacific.

“The recognition they are receiving today is a strong affirmation of the significance of that work, which positively impacts the lives of many people in Malaysia, the Republic of Korea and beyond.”

Dr Ahmad was awarded the Dr LEE Jong-wook Memorial Prize for Public Health for her research on the therapeutic use of maggots (fly larvae) to clear and expedite the healing of wounds and foot ulcers caused by diabetes. The maggots remove dead tissue and secrete antimicrobial substances that fight infection and promote healing.

The number of people with diabetes is growing around the world, and diabetic foot ulcers are a serious but relatively common complication. If these wounds are not properly treated and become infected, especially with antibiotic-resistant bacteria, it could result in needing to amputate the affected limb.

In Malaysia, about six per cent of patients attending diabetic outpatient facilities develop foot ulcers, and foot complications account for 12 per cent of all diabetes hospital admissions.

Dr Ahmad’s method is effective, affordable, simple and available at any time and in any healthcare setting, including small local clinics, said the WHO.

When accepting the award, Dr Ahmad said: “Today, our therapy is being practised in health clinics in most districts in Malaysia, including in hard-to-reach areas. It is easy to access and affordable for the people, especially socially and geographically disadvantaged groups.

“We brought our research findings from the laboratory to the bedside, and now we’re preventing limb amputation in diabetic patients in health clinics. This is in line with achieving the ultimate goal of primary health care as advocated by WHO—reducing exclusion and social disparities in health and organizing health services around people’s needs and expectations.”

KIDS received the 2018 United Arab Emirates Health Foundation Prize for its outstanding contribution to health development. The Institute works to improve health in the Republic of Korea by working on prevention and recognition of drug safety-related issues, supporting evidence-based decisions on drug safety, disseminating safety information, and increasing public awareness.

The country’s pharmacovigilance system to monitor the effects of medical drugs consists of 27 regional centres. In this decentralised system, KIDS functions as the focal point, gathering and reporting data from these centres.

The data are used to provide the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety with statistics, safety information and reports of all adverse events. The reporting system further feeds into Vigibase, the global database managed by the WHO Programme for International Drug Monitoring.

“Nationwide, KIDS operates 27 regional pharmacovigilance centres, promoting the reporting of adverse drug reaction cases and incorporating the data into the WHO international pharmacovigilance programme. We take various safety measures proactively and are keen to share with WHO and other countries our experience and achievements in drug safety management,” said Dr Soo Youn Chung of KIDS. 

Each year, at the World Health Assembly held in Geneva, prizes are given to recognise expertise and accomplishments in public health.

The prizes have been established either in the name of eminent health professionals and international figures or by prominent foundations committed to supporting international and global public health. Nominations are submitted by national health administrations and former prize recipients and reviewed by specialized selection panels of each of the foundations awarding a prize. The WHO Executive Board, in its January session, designates the winners based on recommendations made by the selection panels.

The Dr Lee Jong-wook Memorial Prize for Public Health is given to an individual whose work has gone far beyond the performance of duties normally expected of an official of a government or intergovernmental institution.

The United Arab Emirates Health Foundation Prize is awarded to a person, institution or nongovernmental organization that has made an outstanding contribution to health development.

Other prizes presented at the World Health Assembly this year were: the Ihsan Doğramacı Family Health Foundation Prize to Professor Vinod Kumar Paul (India); the Sasakawa Health Prize to the Fundación Pro Unidad de Cuidado Paliativo (Pro Palliative Care Unit Foundation) (Costa Rica); and His Highness Sheikh Sabah Al-Ahmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah Prize for Research in Health Care for the Elderly and in Health Promotion to Association El Badr, Association d’aides aux malades atteints de cancer (El Badr Association, Cancer Patient Association) (Algeria).

CHRIS JOHNSON 

 

New kit to help with the management of bedwetting children

A new report from the NSW Agency for Clinical Innovation (ACI) has highlighted the need for improved management and healthcare of bedwetting children.

Titled, Young People with Urinary Incontinence, the report was released ahead of World Bedwetting Day, which is May 29.

In partnership with the Sydney Children’s Hospital Network and the Continence Foundation of Australia, ACI took part in a project known as PISCES, which stands for paediatric information, schema, continence, education, support.

The project was designed to better understand the experiences of children with urinary incontinence, their parents, and the health practitioners who support them.

The report of the project details difficulties in obtaining timely diagnosis and support for the problem, with parents being routinely told “the child will grow out of it”, and limited information about it being available.

The release of the report also coincided with the second edition of the Australian Nocturnal Enuresis Resource Kit, developed by the partnership and focussing on the issues surrounding lack of information and delayed access to specialist care post-diagnosis.

Designed to help fill this void, the kit serves as a resource for Australian healthcare professionals, patients and carers.

Nocturnal enuresis, or bedwetting, is defined as the intermittent leakage of urine during sleep.

According to the kit’s co-authors, paediatrician at the Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Associate Professor Patrina Caldwell; and paediatric urologist at John Hunter Children’s Hospital, Dr Aniruddh Deshpande, such a resource is essential in providing additional support to all those affected by nocturnal enuresis.

“We know there are delays diagnosing and treating nocturnal enuresis. Patients and their families require support throughout the treatment journey. Healthcare professionals sometimes need additional help to support their patients, particularly when initial attempts at treatments fail,” Professor Caldwell said.

“The Nocturnal Enuresis Resource Kit is designed to offer this support, by providing current and relevant information on nocturnal enuresis management and how to address the challenges and barriers that may present. 

“There is a common assumption that bedwetting resolves spontaneously. However, the impact of bedwetting on those who continue to experience nocturnal enuresis is often ignored. Bedwetting can significantly impact sleep quality, self-esteem, emotional wellbeing and daytime functioning, both at school and socially.

“This stigmatising condition is often not talked about, as children are usually very embarrassed about it, leading to feelings of shame, guilt, and helplessness.”

As many as 20 per cent of children continue to wet the bed at five years of age, while nocturnal enuresis, which has a male skew, ­­­­affects as many as 10 per cent of 10-year-olds.  Research shows that the risk of bedwetting increases if the child’s mother, more so than their father, experienced enuresis as a child.

Dr Deshpande said we now know how nocturnal enuresis affects a child’s psychosocial development and perceived quality of life. This impact is not severity dependent, but rather, age and gender dependent.

“Although the negative impact is broadly felt by all affected children, it appears to be perceived significantly more by girls and older children,” Dr Deshpande said.

“This is perhaps counter intuitive and mandates an appropriate response at the primary care level. Research also suggests children who are treated for nocturnal enuresis show improvements in their working memory and other daily activities.

“However, the management of nocturnal enuresis appears to be inadequately taught in medical schools and perhaps even in junior medical staff years, so many GPs may not feel confident initiating treatment of an enuretic child, or know what to do should the initial treatment fail.

“We believe GPs can successfully manage a significant proportion of these children. Therefore, we would encourage the GPs to use the principles, tools and steps outlined in the Nocturnal Enuresis Resource Kit, and offer treatment to enuretic children who seek help.”

Continence Foundation of Australia chief executive officer Rowan Cockerell said the common assumption that children will always simply outgrow bedwetting is something that needed to be addressed. 

The Nocturnal Enuresis Resource Kit features the latest clinical evidence for the condition, including non-pharmacological approaches, such as pelvic floor training and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) therapy. The updated pharmacotherapy section also reflects current, evidence-based practice recommendations and algorithms.

CHRIS JOHNSON

A copy of the Nocturnal Enuresis Resource Kit can be downloaded at:  https://www.neresourcekit.com.au 

 The Young People with Urinary Incontinence report can be found at: https://www.aci.health.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/421896/ACI_0024c-PISCES_Patient-experience-report-A4_FINAL.pdf