×

Cancer warnings mooted for every Canadian cigarette

The Canadian Government is considering placing health warnings directly on individual cigarettes.

Health Minister Ginette Petitpas Taylor used World No Tobacco Day to describe the idea as “bold” and said it was being looked into.

The proposed measure is being studied by Canada’s Health Department officials, she said.

“Some people have suggested the idea of putting a warning on individual cigarettes and using what we call sliding shell,” Ms Petitpas Taylor told the Tobacco Control Forum.

“I have to tell you these ideas are being studied and I also have to tell you I really like them. They are quite bold.

“When I look at the rates of tobacco use, we have certainly come a long ways, but I personally believe a lot of work needs to be done in this area.”

Canada has followed Australia’s lead in legislating for plain packaging of cigarettes. New laws there should kick in by the end of the year, the Bill having recently received royal assent.

As was the case in Australia, the new packaging rules were bitterly fought by the big tobacco lobby, but it will nonetheless be illegal for cigarette packets to carry logos, promotional information, or branding.

Placing health warnings on individual cigarettes would be a leap further, but one that is being welcomed by health groups and anti-tobacco campaigners.

The Canadian Cancer Society praised the Health Minister’s comments on the individual warnings.

“The tobacco companies place the brand name and logos on the cigarette themselves, it’s a very good way to communicate with consumers,” said the society’s Rob Cunningham

“Under plain packaging, they will no longer be able to have that, so it is a great idea to have a health warning.”

Mr Cunningham suggested a single word like “cancer” or “emphysema” printed on a cigarette could be highly effective.

CHRIS JOHNSON

[Editorial] False hope with the Right to Try Act

On Wednesday, May 30, US President Donald Trump signed the Right to Try Act, a law designed to remove the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) from decisions on allowing patients to seek early access to experimental and unapproved drugs that have passed phase 1 trials. Advocates argue that streamlining the process will allow more people access, and perhaps allow lives to be extended or saved. Trump said that the new law could save “hundreds of thousands” of lives.

AMSA President delivers confronting speech

Between the votes for AMA President and AMA Vice President at National Conference, AMSA President Alex Farrell eloquently delivered a powerful address that captivated all in attendance. Among the topics she focused on were gender equity, sexism, racism, harassment, and mental health. Conference delegates gave her a standing ovation.

Below is a transcript her address.

Hello, my name is Alex, and I’m the President of the Australian Medical Students’ Association.

I would like to acknowledge the Ngunnawal people who are the traditional custodians of this land and pay respect to the Elders of the Ngunnawal Nation, past, present, and emerging.

Thank you to the AMA, not only for the chance to address you today, but for the ongoing support you’ve shown AMSA and all Australian medical students.

On my first day of medical school, we were asked to look on either side of us. It was a fun guessing game, which of us three would develop mental illnesses as part of our course.

A few months later, I first became involved in AMSA because, as a student starting to see the broken parts of our system, it seemed to be where stuff got done. Doctors, and by extension medical students, hold a trusted place in society, and I saw AMSA bringing us together so we could use our collective political capital for actual outcomes. Realising that students’ voices mattered in the conversation, and through groups like AMSA and the AMA I could contribute to real change, was incredibly empowering. It was also daunting, because we still have a lot to work on.

Where our organisations speak out, people listen. Students will remember the AMA joining us in the fight for marriage equality for a long time to come. It was a powerful signal to the Australian community that doctors support our queer patients and peers, at a time when many were hurting. It mattered.

The AMA speaking out on the health of refugees on Manus and Nauru mattered.

That is quite the responsibility. Here in this room, you are the people who will continue to set the AMA’s vision and messages going forward. Often that will be on issues affecting the health of all Australians. For today, I want to look a little closer to home, at medical culture.

I am often told that when it comes to changing culture, students are the way forward. This year I’ve sat in countless meetings where reassurances have been given that our problems will be solved, because the younger generation will eventually reach the top, and we have the mindset to create ‘the change’.

The medical students of Australia are extraordinary. But that is a huge burden to place on our shoulders alone, without the structures to support us. We have the least power, and often the most to lose.

‘Generational change’ is a myth when the problems lie in a system that the upcoming generations are still trained to conform to. They will continue to perpetuate that culture, unless it is actively disrupted.

We need support from you, doctors who have power in the system to help us change it.

I’ve been lucky enough to spend this year listening to students and hearing their stories. I’m here representing an exceptional group with diverse backgrounds and experiences.

Medical school has never been without its difficulties. While some may have shifted for the better since your training years, in other ways we face new challenges, and old challenges we hoped would have disappeared.

Challenges in gender equity, and diversity in leadership, in mental health and mistreatment in medical education, and in the growing training pressures that we’ll face on graduation.

To begin, gender inequity is alive and well in medicine today. It covers a spectrum of sexist behaviour, from well-meaning but gendered comments, to clearly abhorrent harassment and assault.

You heard yesterday about the very real barriers women in medicine face on a daily basis. The invasive interview questions, the pregnancy discrimination, the pay gap.

This starts in medical school. Every female student will recall a time they were told to avoid specialties that aren’t ‘family friendly’. I’ve spoken to students told that “there’s no point teaching them how to suture, because they are just going to become a GP anyway”. To a student whose supervisor was well known to either bully or flirt with their female students, and told she was lucky to be picked for the latter.

It’s what we call unconscious bias. Women and men alike, not meaning to, doubt women’s abilities just that much more. Women need to work harder to prove themselves, because they don’t fit the leadership image we all expect to see, whether that’s in an operating theatre or hospital board room. It’s not really about gender or sex, it is about power and authority, and who we see holding it.

Women are under-represented in nearly every position of medical leadership. They are far less likely to be medical school deans, chief executives of hospitals, receive research grants, or be AMA Presidents. They are less quickly promoted, less well paid.

The truth is, most doctors involved in the lower levels of sexism and harassment aren’t malicious. They may think they are being helpful, or flattering, or telling a harmless joke. Many never actually receive feedback that they are being inappropriate. And so the behaviour builds, and the lack of accountability builds, and for the few with bad intentions, the opportunities to abuse power also build up.

As we tolerate less confronting comments, we pave the way for them to escalate unchecked.Everyday sexism looks benign, but it has shaped what medicine looks like, from our first year university students, all the way up to the people here today.

In the past couple of years, medicine in Australia has been rocked by the revelation of endemic harassment. I don’t think anyone will be truly surprised when the next horrible event breaks. We haven’t changed enough to expect them to stop. But it’s not enough to wait till then to be shocked back into action. There’s no more room for apathy in this space.

The same goes for all vulnerable population groups. There are exceptional Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander medical students but, compared to other students, the barriers to graduating can pile up.

Earlier this year, I was able to speak to the student representatives of the Australian Indigenous Doctors’ Association, AIDA, and hear their stories of daily stereotyping and racist comments, of being regularly told they had taken the place of someone who actually deserved to be in medicine.

A survey by AIDA has found that nearly 50 per cent of our Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander doctors face bullying, racism or violence a few times a month, or even daily.

While more and more, the makeup of medical students reflects our population, this isn’t reaching the tiers of leadership where the ability to really create change lies.

The hurdles to being leaders and advocates are only escalated when certain groups are less valued and protected in the medical sphere.

For students and doctors in training, the health industry is hierarchical and rigid. Challenging norms simply isn’t safe territory. We know that most students mistreated during their medical training don’t report it, for two key reasons. They don’t know how, and they’re afraid of what might happen if they do speak up.

When asked to elaborate, these are their responses:

“We are taught from our first year that whistle blowing in medicine is career suicide”

“My supervisor could be my examiner”

“I tried – the university told me it was the hospital’s responsibility, the hospital directed me back to the university’

“It doesn’t look good for getting into a specialty program”

Even as someone who has spent this year speaking out on this issue, when I go back into clinical rotations next year, I can’t say with confidence that I’ll report bullying or harassment if it happens to me. I, as so many students are, am worried about what might happen on the wards, but I’m even more worried about what might happen with a report.

Which means that responsibility to speak up lies with you. To take colleagues aside if they might be crossing lines. To create systems in hospitals where reporting doesn’t put students and staff at risk. To demand tangible consequences.

We can change the structure that drives medical culture. We need only look at the issue of mental health, to see this community rally, and say ‘enough is enough’.

The promises from COAG to change mandatory reporting laws to remove barriers for health professionals to seek appropriate treatment for mental health are proof of that. That came from sustained and powerful advocacy, from students and the AMA.

The work is far from done, but as a start I’m hoping I can look forward to not hearing any more stories of students being told that seeing a GP will end their career.

It won’t solve all the culprits behind poor student mental health. As students we are staring down the barrel of the building pressure of vocational training – there are far more of us graduating than there are specialty training places, and by the time it is our turn to apply, it will be reaching crisis point.

Knowing that is the future for us, it should come as no surprise that students are doing anything we can to get ahead. Research projects in the holidays, Masters degrees in parallel with full-time medicine and part-time jobs. We can talk about work-life balance as much as we would like, but while this is the status quo, mental health will suffer.

Once out in the workforce, many of us will take years off clinical practice for PHDs or other pieces of paper to make us better candidates, but not necessarily better doctors. We will follow the signals that Colleges and the Profession send us – for a focus on clinical education and service, like so many of you yesterday placed as a priority, they need to be recognised accordingly.

When it comes to mental health, there is one area where students and senior doctors still seem to often not see eye to eye – resilience.

For us, resilience has become a dirty word. That’s not because we don’t believe in prioritising mental wellness. It’s a word that has been overused, at the worst times. Resilience is a suicidal friend pointed towards mindfulness courses. It takes students at the darkest point, and tells them they just should have been stronger. It acknowledges that the medical training environment is flawed, but at the same time says that the answer is fixing students, rather than seeking larger change. That is what students hear.  

So instead, let’s talk about what they are being resilient against.

Sixty per cent of medical students have witnessed mistreatment in medical education. That’s two in every three. Most the time, this comes as belittlement, condescension or humiliation.

Women are more likely to be mistreated in medical education than men, queer students more than heterosexual, clinical students more than pre-clinical. Consultants are the main offenders in half of the cases.

In the medical world, we are expected to teach and lead as a core part of our work. Doctors spend years learning to practise medicine, but are expected to teach with no training at all.

Your actions matter to the students in front of you in that moment, but also for what they role model going forward. We replicate the examples that were shown to us in our training – so the way you teach now will shape what the medical profession looks in 20 years. If you want to see things change, that is the first place to start.

As a teacher, role model safe practice, good communication, work-life balance. A positive culture is a safe culture.

I know it is not always easy.  As students we take time away from your busy days. Sometimes we don’t know how to help, and know that our gaps in knowledge fall short of your expectations. All students know the feeling of being a burden on their team. But to learn, we need to be in the room, and able to ask those questions.

Medical students want to work hard, and to be good, safe doctors.

You hold the power to impact the lives of your students each and every day. That’s not to say they need to be your first priority. Your patients always come first. But it doesn’t have to be one or the other. It only takes a moment to say good job, or to answer a question, or explain how to improve next time.

That moment can make your student’s day. It can keep their love for medicine going, through all the other parts of this profession that may otherwise leave us disillusioned far too soon.

Thank you to all of you here who make that effort to be positive mentors and teachers. You are appreciated.

I believe that we can build a medical culture that is safe and nurturing. But it can’t wait 20 years, when my peers are filling these seats. It has to start now, and it has to come from the top. In the way you teach, in the way you lead, and in the systems you influence, be part of that change, and I promise, we will do you proud.

 

AMA President opens his last conference

Dr Michael Gannon opened the AMA National Conference 2018 by figuratively saying goodbye.

In his last opening address as AMA President, which was at times emotional, Dr Gannon detailed a long list of achievements secured by the AMA during his two-year tenure.

And he poured praise on the organisation he said he enjoyed leading since 2016.

“I must say that it has been a huge honour and privilege to serve the AMA and the medical profession as Federal President,” Dr Gannon said.

“It is demanding, challenging, rewarding, and life-changing. The issues, the experiences, the depth and breadth of policy and ideas, and the interface with our political leaders and the Parliament are unique to this job.

“The responsibility is immense. The payback is the knowledge that you can achieve great things for the AMA members, the whole medical profession and, most importantly, the community, and the patients in our care.”

His address focused largely on the ground covered since the AMA met for national conference in 2017.

Describing it as a “very busy and very successful year for the Federal AMA,” Dr Gannon said time had passed very quickly in the job but much had been accomplished.

“Throughout the last 12 months, your elected representatives and the hardworking staff in the Secretariat in Canberra have delivered significant achievements in policy, advocacy, political influence, professional standards, doctors’ health, media profile, and public relations,” he said.

“We all worked tirelessly to ensure that health policy and bureaucratic processes were shaped to provide the best possible professional working environments for Australian doctors and the highest quality care for our patients.

“The unique role of the AMA in health advocacy is that we are looked to for commentary on the breadth and depth of health policy, social policy, and the health system.”

Dr Gannon said strong and robust advocacy led to a number of policy outcomes at the federal political level.

He said many organisations get nothing for their efforts, but the AMA never gives up.

“To be successful in Canberra, you have to learn to take the knocks along with the wins, then go back again and again for a better outcome,” he said.

“It is breathtakingly naïve to think it works otherwise. And that is what we have done, and keep doing.”

In 2017, the AMA launched its regular Safe Hours Audit Report, which gave added focus to the emerging issue of doctors’ health.

To enhance this focus on doctors’ health, AMA coordination of Doctors’ Health Services continues all around the country, with funding support from the Medical Board of Australia.

“We maintained a strong focus on medical workforce and training places, which resulted in the National Medical Training Advisory Network significantly increasing its workforce modelling work,” Dr Gannon told the conference.

“We secured a number of concessions in the proposed redesign of the Practice Incentive Program, as well as a delay in the introduction of changes.

“The AMA lobbied at the highest level for a more durable solution to concerns over Pathology collection centre rents. We focused on effective compliance, and achieving a fair balance between the interests of GP members and Pathologist members.

“We led the reforms to after-hours GP services provided through Medical Deputising Services to ensure that these services are better targeted, and there is stronger communication between them and a patient’s usual GP.

“We successfully lobbied the ACCC to renew the AMA’s existing authorisation that permits GPs to engage in intra-practice price setting. This potentially saves GPs thousands of dollars every year in legal and other compliance costs.

“We ensured a proportionate response from the Government in response to concerns over the security of Medicare card numbers. This avoided more draconian proposals that would have added to the compliance burden on practices, and added a barrier to care for patients.

“We fundamentally altered the direction of the Medical Indemnity Insurance Review.”

The AMA campaigned on the issue of doctors’ health and the need for COAG to change mandatory reporting laws, promoting the WA model.

It led a nationally coordinated campaign with the State AMAs and other peak bodies to uphold the TGA’s decision to up-schedule Codeine.

It campaigned against an inadequate, poorly conceived, and ideological National Maternity Services Framework, which has now been scrapped.

The 2018 AMA Public Hospital Report Card put the political, media, and public focus on the stresses and pressures on public hospitals and all who work in them. The current funding model, based entirely around payments for activity, discourages innovation and is inadequate in addressing the demands placed by an ageing population.

“We prosecuted the case for vastly improved Private Health Insurance products through membership of the Private Health Ministerial Advisory Committee, my annual National Press Club Address, an appearance before a Senate Select Committee, and regular and ongoing media and advocacy,” Dr Gannon said.

“This work was complemented by the launch of the AMA Private Health Insurance Report Card.

“We successfully lobbied for a fundamental change in the direction of the Anaesthesia Clinical Committee of the MBS Review. The Australian Society of Anaesthetists were grateful for our assistance and leadership. Many other Colleges, Associations and Societies have worked out that partnership with, rather than competing with, the AMA is the smartest way to get results.

“We launched a new AMA Fees List with all the associated benefits of mobility and regular updates.

“We saw a number of our Aged Care policy recommendations included in a number of Government reviews.

“We lobbied against what could easily have been an ill-thought-out UK-style Revalidation proposal. Our work resulted in a vastly improved Professional Performance Framework based around enhanced Continuing Professional Development.”

Dr Gannon said the AMA had provided strong leadership right across the busy public health landscape over the past year.

The AMA Indigenous Health Report Card focused on ear health, and specifically chronic otitis media.

The Federal Council endorsed the Uluru Statement from the Heart, acknowledging that Recognition is another key social determinant of health for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians.

A product of a policy session at last year’s AMA National Conference was the subsequent updating of the AMA Position Statement on Obesity,

“I think that it is inevitable that we will eventually see a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages similar to those recently introduced in Britain and Ireland,” Dr Gannon said.

“In fact it is so simple, so easy, and so obvious, I worry that it will be seen by a future Government as a ‘silver bullet’ to what is a much more complex health and social policy issue.”

Position Statements on an Australian Centre for Disease Control; Female Genital Mutilation; Infant Feeding and Maternal Health; Harmful Substance Use, Dependence, and Behavioural Addiction; and Firearms were also highlighted.

“We conducted ongoing and prominent advocacy for the health and wellbeing of Asylum Seekers and Refugees,” he said.

“We promoted the benefits of immunisation to individuals and the broader community. Our advocacy has contributed to an increase in vaccination rates.

“We provided strong advocacy on climate change and health, among a broader suite of commentary on environmental issues.

“We consistently advocated for better women’s health services. And released a first ever statement on Men’s Health.”

New Position Statements were also released on Mental Health, Road Safety, Nutrition, Organ Donation and Transplantation, Blood Borne Viruses, and Rural Workforce.

“We promoted our carefully constructed position statement on Euthanasia and Physician Assisted Suicide during consideration of legislation in Tasmania, Victoria, New South Wales and WA,” Dr Gannon said.

“That advocacy was not universally popular. Our Position Statement acknowledges the diversity of opinion within the profession…

“We led the medical community by being the first to release a Position Statement on Marriage Equalityand advocated for the legislative change that eventuated in late 2017.”

In July 2017, AMA advocacy was publicly recognised when the Governance Institute rated the AMA as the most ethical and the most successful lobby group in Australia.

Dr Gannon added that the highlight of the 2017 international calendar for him was the annual General Assembly of the World Medical Association.

“Outcomes from that meeting included high level discussions on end-of-life care, climate change and environmental health, numerous other global social and ethical issues, and seeing the inclusion of doctors’ health as a core issue in both medical ethics and professionalism,” he said.

“I get goosebumps when I read aloud the Declaration of Geneva. It is a source of immense personal pride that I was intimately involved with its latest editorial revision, only the fifth since 1948.

“But our focus remained at home, and your AMA was very active in promoting our Mission: Leading Australia’s Doctors – Promoting Australia’s Health.

“We had great successes. We earned and maintained the respect of our politicians, the bureaucracy, and the health sector.

“We won the support of the public as we have fought for a better health system for all Australians.”

Dr Gannon thanked his family, staff, the AMA Secretariat, Board and Federal Council.

CHRIS JOHNSON

When your patient wants to record the consult

 

You’re getting ready to examine your patient when she tells you she wants to record what you have to say to her. Or perhaps she wants to prop up her smartphone on the desk and film you as well. Or maybe halfway through the consult, you notice the smartphone on her lap, and you have a sneaking suspicion she’s recording you without your permission. How do you react?

With smartphone ubiquity, everyone has a recording device on their person these days. An increasing number of people are asking their doctors whether they can record their conversations – and there have even been cases of patients uploading recordings or videos to youtube. What should doctors do?

First, there’s the legal issue. Is it lawful for the patient to record a consult without the doctor’s permission? The answer to that varies according to the jurisdiction. In the Top End, Queensland and Victoria, patients can record consults without seeking permission from their doctor, as long as the recording is for personal use and not shared with a third party. But in all other jurisdictions, consent from the doctor is required. This was upheld in NSW law in 2014, in a case where a patient secretly made a video recording of a female GP doing an examination for a groin hernia. The patient was charged with an offence under the Surveillance Devices Act 2007 (NSW), for the use of a listening device to record a private conversation to which he was a party.

In all states and territories, consent must be sought from the doctor before publishing or sharing a video or audio recording of a consult. Which means any uploading of videos or recordings to the Internet without your knowledge are illegal, and you should contact your medical insurer if you become aware of this happening.

If a patient asks your permission to record, what should you do? You have the option to decline, and if the patient insists, you may decide to terminate the patient-doctor relationship. But you should also be aware of your duty of care, which means that in such cases you will need to be able to assure continuity of care, and you will still need to treat the patient in cases of emergency.

You need not necessarily be suspicious of a patient who wants to record the encounter. Many studies have shown that retention of information after a consult is poor, and that information retained is often wrongly recalled, in any case. With compliance being a major issue in treatment, it may not be such a bad thing that the patient has an audio record of what you have told him or her.

There should be no need to change the way you do your consults if a recording is made, but it might be wise to ask for a copy, or to make your own simultaneous recording for your patient’s medical records. All electronic communications, such as recordings, text messages or emails can form part of the patient’s medical record.

In the case of a surreptitious recording, it appears to be unlikely that it could be used against you in a case of medical negligence, although the key factor would be whether the probative value of the evidence outweighed the prejudice of admitting it, according to MDA National medicolegal manager Dr Sara Bird.

In any case, it seems that it would be best to make peace with the recording of consults, given the increasing prevalence of people recording their lives and the possible benefits of increased compliance.

Sources: Avant, MDA National

[Series] Canada’s universal health-care system: achieving its potential

Access to health care based on need rather than ability to pay was the founding principle of the Canadian health-care system. Medicare was born in one province in 1947. It spread across the country through federal cost sharing, and eventually was harmonised through standards in a federal law, the Canada Health Act of 1984. The health-care system is less a true national system than a decentralised collection of provincial and territorial insurance plans covering a narrow basket of services, which are free at the point of care.

Physician banned for a decade for unnecessary prescribing

A specialist physician has been found guilty of professional misconduct after prescribing anabolic steroids and drugs when there was no therapeutic basis, and for failing to keep adequate records.

Three separate notifications against the specialist physician were made concerning the prescribing of medication and record keeping after a practitioner made a complaint to the Medical Board of Australia.

The case, which was referred to the applicable state’s administrative tribunal, serves as a reminder to physicians to ensure they only prescribe medication for a therapeutic purpose and the importance of keeping good records.

Physician accused of prescribing drugs for body building

The Medical Board alleged that the specialist physician had prescribed anabolic androgenic steroids, human growth hormone (HGH), clenbuterol, clomid and ephedrine to numerous patients looking to lose weight or for body building and conditioning. It was also claimed he prescribed treatments such as iron and frozen plasma infusions, as well as DEXA scans without having a therapeutic indication.

The Medical Board claimed these drugs and treatments were prescribed when there was no therapeutic basis and that the specialist physician unnecessarily exposed patients to potential adverse effects associated with the drugs. Also, that the specialist physician had failed to keep adequate records. These allegations regarded both the specialist physician’s general practice and the specific treatment of two patients.

Honesty is the best policy

The physician didn’t deny he had prescribed the drugs or treatments in question to his patients, but in letters to the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) and Board, he emphasised that he was providing treatment for a therapeutic purpose and explicitly stated in one letter that “I do not prescribe to body builders.” Reasons given for prescribing such drugs included obesity, anaemia and osteoporosis.

However, it was noted that objective evidence didn’t correspond with the evidence provided by the specialist physician. In particular, the tribunal drew attention to Patient A’s case, where the specialist physician claimed the patient was being treated for obesity.

The tribunal referred to photographic evidence, which clearly revealed that Patient A was not obese, but a body builder. The patient’s prescription history showed that the specialist physician had prescribed – steroids and drugs used for body building and conditioning for five years.

In the witness box, the physician admitted to being Patient A’s steroid supplier for the purpose of body building because he believed it was better for him to prescribe these drugs than for the patient to purchase them on the street.

The specialist physician then admitted to doing the same for more than 20 patients, confirming he didn’t prescribe the medication for a therapeutic reason and therefore proving his previous statements to AHPRA and the Medical Board to be false.

While, initially, the specialist physician denied the clinical records were inadequate, in closing submissions it was conceded that he failed to make adequate notes for patients who consulted him for obesity and weight loss, physical conditioning, body building and for patients who were prescribed various drugs, including anabolic androgenic steroids.

Decision and penalty

The tribunal found that the specialist physician’s actions constituted professional misconduct because he prescribed anabolic steroids, HGH and clenbuterol (among other drugs and treatments) for no therapeutic reason and that this “unnecessarily put patients at risk of the adverse effects of those drugs”.

Not keeping accurate records of patient consultations and treatments it was said, would be “regarded as improper by professional colleagues of good repute and competence” and that “Such conduct was substantially below [the] standard reasonably expected of a registered medical practitioner of an equivalent level of training or experience”.

In its finding, the tribunal stated that the specialist physician’s misconduct was so serious, involved a large number of patients and that the misconduct extended over a substantial period of time, that had his registration not already lapsed, it would have been cancelled. The specialist physician was disqualified from applying for re-registration for 10 years and ordered to pay the Medical Board’s costs.

Ultimately, despite the Medical Board seeking a reprimand against the specialist physician, the tribunal decided the disqualification was significant enough of a penalty.

The specialist physician was also fined $5,000 for sending an abusive letter to the notifying practitioner, as a deterrent to other practitioners from doing the same.

Treating athletes

If you treat athletes you should note that in September 2017, AHPRA and the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority (ASADA) reached a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). The purpose of the MOU is to ensure that AHPRA and ASADA cooperate in the investigation of practitioners who prescribe performance enhancing drugs without a genuine therapeutic need.

Key learnings

  • While this is an extreme example, this decision highlights the importance of making sure when you are prescribing medications that they are therapeutically indicated and do not unnecessarily expose patients to adverse side effects.
  • Be thorough when recording your consultations and prescriptions – note down the therapeutic indication as well as the dosage, frequency and period of prescription.
  • It goes without saying, that it is inappropriate to be derogatory or offensive to notifying practitioners (or patients) who have made a complaint about you to the Medical Board.

This article was originally published by Avant Mutual. You can access the original here.

[Comment] Canada’s efforts to ensure the health and wellbeing of Indigenous peoples

In September, 2017, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau stood before the UN General Assembly and acknowledged that the “failure of successive Canadian governments to respect the rights of Indigenous peoples in Canada is our great shame.”1 For generations, First Nations, Inuit, and Métis peoples in Canada were denied the right to self-determination and subjected to laws, policies, and practices based on domination and assimilation. Indigenous peoples lost control over their own lives.

[Comment] Social lobbying: a call to arms for public health

The term lobbying derives from the public lobbies of the UK Houses of Parliament in London, where concerned citizens have gathered since at least the 16th century to speak with elected officials on the sidelines of legislative debates. In today’s parlance, lobbying has evolved to represent a more pernicious and systematic approach to influencing lawmakers, occurring much deeper within the corridors of power.