×

Hookworm in the Northern Territory: down but not out

Hookworms (Ancylostoma duodenale and Necator americanus) are thought to infect 740 million people worldwide.1 Most infections occur in low- and middle-income countries where the root causes are socioeconomic vulnerability and limited access to safe water, good hygiene and adequate sanitation. Hookworm, along with other soil-transmitted helminthiases, is included in the World Health Organization category of neglected tropical diseases. A. duodenale is thought to be the exclusive species in the Northern Territory and is associated with the greatest intestinal blood loss.2,3

The major consequence of hookworm infection (HWI) is iron-deficiency anaemia, which is responsible for significant morbidity, particularly in children and pregnant women. In children, HWI is associated with impaired nutritional status and physical and mental development.4 HWI is considered a public health problem in a country when the prevalence of infection in children aged 1–14 years is > 1%. The WHO’s 2010 global target of 75% coverage of preventive chemotherapy or “deworming” in such countries was not met and has been extended to 2020.1 A recent Cochrane review concluded that the evidence base supporting the effectiveness of routine deworming programs was small and insufficient using Cochrane principles,5 but there is considerable historical support for the role of mass drug therapy for HWI, in parallel with sanitation and hygiene initiatives.1

Although virtually eradicated from the non-Indigenous Australian population by the 1960s, HWI has persisted in Indigenous Australians in remote communities and in immigrants from endemic countries.2 After successful lobbying by NT clinicians for registration of albendazole in Australia,6 instead of the inferior pyrantel, the Indigenous community children’s deworming program (CCDP) with albendazole commenced in 1995 in the NT.7 The Central Australian Rural Practitioners Association (CARPA) Standard treatment manual recommends that in areas where HWI is common, children aged 6 months to 16 years should have a single dose of albendazole twice a year (or pyrantel if pregnant).8 It suggests administration either side of the wet season, in conjunction with routine child health assessments or school-age screening.

Recent epidemiological data on the prevalence of HWI in the NT are not available,9 and there are no published data on the implementation and effectiveness of the CCDP. The objectives of this study were to determine the prevalence and trends of human HWI in the NT over the past 10 years and to assess the influence of the CCDP.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective observational analysis of consecutive microbiologically confirmed cases of HWI in the NT between January 2002 and July 2012. Ethics approval for the study was obtained from the Human Research Ethics Committee of the NT Department of Health and Menzies School of Health Research (HREC-2012-1842).

Data collection

Cases were identified from the NT government pathology laboratories information system, LabTrak, which covers all NT government health care facilities, including five hospitals, two correctional centres and more than 50 remote clinics, that collectively serve a current population of about 235 000.10 We also identified cases from data obtained from Western Diagnostic Pathology, the major private provider of pathology services to remote clinics and Aboriginal community-controlled health services in the NT. Data were not available from the two other private providers of pathology services to the NT. Each pathology laboratory examined faecal specimens for hookworm eggs by wet mount microscopy and a concentration method.11

Data on identified HWI cases were linked to NT government electronic health records by medical record number to collect information on patients’ age, sex, Indigenous status, residence, haemoglobin level and eosinophil count at the time of diagnosis. Residence was determined from residential address, and remote (including very remote) areas of residence were defined as per the Australian Standard Geographical Classification.12 Anaemia was defined as a haemoglobin level < 110 g/L, and eosinophilia as an eosinophil count ≥ 0.5 × 109/L.8 We were unable to obtain data on anthelmintic treatment for individual patients. Attempts to obtain robust data regarding numbers of doses of albendazole dispensed per community clinic for the CCDP were not successful.

Statistical analysis

Data were entered into a Microsoft Access 2007 database and analysed using Stata, version 10 (StataCorp). Descriptive statistics are presented for all patients with HWI between January 2002 and July 2012. Differences between adults and children were determined using the Fisher exact test for categorical variables (sex, Indigenous status, residence) and Mann–Whitney tests for continuous non-normally distributed variables (haemoglobin level and eosinophil count). Level of significance was set at P < 0.05.

The estimated annual prevalences for 2002 to 2011 are expressed as cases per 100 000 population, with 95% confidence intervals. The estimated prevalence for 2012 could not be calculated as the dataset only included cases up to the end of July. The estimated annual resident population for the NT was obtained from the Australian Bureau of Statistics.10

Results

From a total of 64 691 faecal specimens examined during the period January 2002 – July 2012, hookworm eggs were identified in 134 samples from 112 patients. Four patients had a second positive faecal sample, all occurring within 8 months of the first detection.

The annual number of faecal samples tested across all NT laboratories was relatively constant, with a median of 5807 from 2002 to 2011 (range, 5379–9785). Only six patients (5.4%) were diagnosed at Western Diagnostic Pathology, with the remainder diagnosed at government laboratories: 87 (77.7%) at Royal Darwin Hospital, 14 (12.5%) at Alice Springs Hospital, and five (4.5%) at district laboratories. All patients except the six diagnosed at Western Diagnostic Pathology were in hospital at the time of diagnosis. The details of the Western Diagnostic Pathology cases were incomplete, but three diagnoses were in Indigenous people living in remote communities.

The demographic characteristics, haemoglobin level and eosinophil count of the patients are shown in Box 1, stratified by age group. There were no statistical differences in Indigenous status or sex between children and adults in the sample, but there was a difference in residence. Median eosinophil count was significantly higher in children than in adults, but there was no significant difference in haemoglobin levels.

Most patients (94; 84.7%) were Indigenous. Seventy-one patients (63.4%) resided in remote areas, of whom 69 were Indigenous. Of the 17 children, 16 were Indigenous and one was from Sudan. All of the Indigenous children resided in remote communities. Twelve of the 13 patients from overseas were from Indonesia. Eleven patients (9.8%) were of no fixed abode in Darwin (all Indigenous), and 23 (20.5%) were diagnosed in prison facilities.

Ninety and 89 of the 112 patients had data available for haemoglobin level and eosinophil count, respectively. Sixty (66.7%) were anaemic and 65 (73.0%) had eosinophilia. Of note, no children and only four adults had neither of these markers present.

The annual prevalence of HWI by age, and the proportion of total faecal samples positive for hookworm are shown in Box 2, with the numbers of cases and population data in Box 3. The estimated prevalence fell relatively steadily over time, from 14.0 per 100 000 population (95% CI, 8.8–19.2) in 2002 to 2.2 per 100 000 population (95% CI, 0.3–4.1) in 2011.

Only 16 patients (14.3%) were in the target age range of the CCDP (6 months to 16 years). The one remaining child was under 6 months of age (5 months old and diagnosed in 2002). There have been only two cases of HWI in the < 17-years age group since 2007 and none since 2010 (Box 3).

Discussion

We found a clear and consistent reduction in the number of microbiologically confirmed cases of HWI occurring in the NT from January 2002 to July 2012. Microbiologically confirmed HWI is now a rare event in the NT and occurs mainly in individuals outside the CCDP target group, particularly in adults, prisoners and homeless urban Indigenous people.

The epidemiology of HWI in Australia has been poorly documented since a national hookworm campaign and survey in 1919–1924 demonstrated a prevalence of 10.7% (14 067/130 833) in endemic areas.2 The campaign, which involved treatment, health education and improving sanitation, was focused on non-Indigenous Australians and led to eradication from this population. The prevalence of HWI in the NT was 17% in the 1924 survey (from 886 faecal samples),2 and 25% in a 1994 survey (from 300 samples) in a remote Indigenous community in east Arnhem Land (Aland K, Prociv P, Currie B, Jones H. Intestinal parasite infections and anaemia in Arnhem Land Aboriginal community [unpublished abstract]. Australian Tropical Health and Nutrition Conference; Brisbane, Qld; 17–19 July 1997). We found the prevalence of HWI in the NT in 2011 had dropped to 2.2%. This reduction has occurred since the commencement of the albendazole-based CCDP in 1995, and extremely low rates of HWI are now seen in its target population. However, the magnitude of the effect of the CCDP remains uncertain, as its implementation and coverage at community or regional level has never been monitored or evaluated.

In contrast to other soil-transmitted helminthiases in which the highest intensity and prevalence of infections occur in school-aged children, high-intensity HWIs predominantly occur in adults.3,13 In 1992, a survey in an isolated community in northern Western Australia found HWI prevalences of 93% in children aged 5–14 years and 77% overall.14 After implementation of a hookworm control program, in which regular albendazole was given to children every 6 months and to adults annually, along with health education and environmental management measures, the overall HWI prevalence rate fell from 80% in 1993 to 2.6% in 1999.15 In our NT data, there was a marked reduction in the prevalence of adult HWI from 2002, despite adults not being targeted in the CCDP. This could in part be attributable to a carryover effect from early intense albendazole use in the CCDP in the 1990s and/or the common use of albendazole in the NT for individuals with anaemia or eosinophilia.8 The CARPA manual recommends empirical treatment with 3 days of albendazole (for hookworm, Trichuris trichiura and Strongyloides stercoralis infection) for anaemia, failure to thrive and significant diarrhoea in children.8

Our retrospective study has several limitations. The true prevalence rates are likely to have been underestimated, as systematic sampling was not undertaken. All except six patients were diagnosed in hospital, reflecting a selection bias towards individuals who seek health care, are acutely ill or have comorbidities. Current remote practitioner guidelines recommend performing faecal microscopy for children with failure to thrive, anaemia or chronic diarrhoea, and for adults who are immunosuppressed.8 However, there are several potential barriers to testing patients in remote communities, including patient acceptability and the geographical logistics of ensuring a quality specimen reaches the testing laboratory.

Some cases of HWI may have been missed, as data were not available from two providers of pathology services to the NT. Nevertheless, for notifiable diseases in the NT such as hepatitis B, the government and Western Diagnostic Pathology laboratories data capture over 90% of diagnoses.16 We believe it is a reasonable assumption that this will also be the case for HWI. Patients residing in remote areas were well represented in the study population, and annual numbers of faecal microscopy testing were relatively constant over the 10 years. Thus, we are confident that the consistent downward trend in prevalence demonstrated by our data reflects a reduction in the true rate. Finally, although we have shown that most patients with HWI in the NT had anaemia and/or eosinophilia, community controls were not available for comparison to support a causative association.

Our study, despite its limitations, shows that the prevalence of HWI in the NT decreased over a 10-year study period. Infection was rare in children, the target group for the longstanding CCDP, but infection persists in Indigenous adults in remote communities and those homeless in urban centres, and in prisoners. This reflects, at least in part, ongoing health and socioeconomic inequalities in the Indigenous population compared with non-Indigenous Australians. Our study supports the need for continuation of the CCDP, together with improvements in housing, health hardware (such as water supply and waste removal systems) and health promotion. It also emphasises the importance of using albendazole in children and adults with anaemia and/or eosinophilia, with the aim of eventual eradication of human HWI from the NT.

1 Demographic and laboratory parameters of patients with hookworm infection, Northern Territory, January 2002 – July 2012

Age group


Parameter

All patients

< 17 years

≥ 17 years

P


Number

112 (

17 (15.2%)

95 (84.8%)

Sex

0.60

Female

51 (45.5%)

9 (52.9%)

42 (44.2%)

Male

61 (54.5%)

8 (47.1%)

53 (55.8%)

Indigenous status*

0.46

Indigenous

94 (84.7%)

16 (94.1%)

78 (83.0%)

Non-Indigenous

17 (15.3%)

1 (5.9%)

16 (17.0%)

Patient residence

0.03

Urban

23 (20.5%)

23 (24.2%)

Remote

71 (63.4%)

16 (94.1%)

55 (57.9%)

Overseas

13 (11.6%)

1 (5.9%)

12 (12.6%)

Unknown

5 (4.5%)

5 (5.3%)

Anaemia

60 (66.7%)

12 (75.0%)

48 (64.9%)

Median haemoglobin, g/L (IQR)

94 (75–120)

91 (56–108)

94 (76–122)

0.18

Eosinophilia§

65 (73.0%)

12 (75.0%)

53 (72.6%)

Median eosinophil count, × 109/L (IQR)§

1.1 (0.3–1.8)

1.9 (0.8–3.4)

0.9 (0.3–1.6)

0.02


IQR = interquartile range. * Defined as Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. Indigenous status was
not available for one patient aged ≥ 17 years. Defined by Australian Standard Geographical Classification.12 Anaemia defined as haemoglobin level < 110 g/L. Data available for 90 patients
(16 patients < 17 years and 74 patients ≥ 17 years). § Eosinophilia defined as an eosinophil count ≥ 0.5 × 109/L. Data available for 89 patients (16 patients < 17 years and 73 patients ≥ 17 years).

2 Annual prevalence of microbiologically confirmed hookworm infection, by age group, and proportion of hookworm-positive faecal samples, Northern Territory, 2002–2012*

* Data for 2012 only include cases up to the end of July.

3 Annual hookworm infection cases and prevalence,* by age group, Northern Territory, 2002–2012

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012


Age < 17 years

Cases (n = 17)

1

5

4

3

2

0

1

0

1

0

0

Population

56 990

56 993

57 123

57 669

58 159

58 280

58 721

59 263

59 316

58 935

59 232

Prevalence*

1.8

8.8

7.0

5.2

3.4

0.0

1.7

0.0

1.7

0.0

0.0

Age 17 years

Cases (n = 95)

27

8

18

9

4

6

4

5

4

5

5

Population

142 421

143 113

144 940

148 704

152 468

156 741

162 214

167 578

170 999

172 396

175 604

Prevalence*

19.0

5.6

12.4

6.1

2.6

3.8

2.5

3.0

2.3

2.9

2.8

All patients

Cases (n = 112)

28

13

22

12

6

6

5

5

5

5

5

Population

199 411

200 106

204 919

206 373

210 627

215 021

220 935

226 841

230 315

231 331

234 836

Prevalence* (95% CI)

14.0 
(8.8–19.2)

6.5 
(3.0–10.0)

10.9 
(6.3–15.4)

5.8 
(2.5–9.1)

2.8 
(0.6–5.1)

2.8 
(0.6–5.0)

2.3 
(0.3–4.3)

2.2 
(0.3–4.1)

2.2 
(0.3–4.1)

2.2 
(0.3–4.1)

2.1 
(0.3–4.0)


* Prevalence per 100 000 population. The number of cases and estimated prevalence for 2012 only include cases up to the end of July. Population figures sourced from the Australian Bureau of Statistics.10

The brain painting: “the snake eating away the life of your memory”

This painting is aimed at an Aboriginal audience and depicts the brain and “the snake eating away the life of your memory” to represent dementia. I intentionally used traditional dot painting style and storytelling to speak directly to Aboriginal people and to bring the causes and signs of dementia to their attention.

I am a Karajarri woman from Bidyadanga community
in Western Australia. I was the project officer for the Indigenous Dementia Services Study, funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council and conducted by the Western Australian Centre for Health and Ageing at the University of Western Australia.
This painting was used as the foundation for a health promotion poster based on the results of the study. The poster explains the risk factors for dementia in Aboriginal people as determined by the research group, including smoking, head injury, previous stroke, epilepsy and old age (listed in the spaces to the right of the brain in the poster). This research also found that dementia is more widespread in Aboriginal men than women. Along with the risk factors, the poster highlights some of the signs of dementia to assist family in identifying the condition (listed in the spaces on the left of the brain in the poster).

Copies of the not-for-profit poster have been distributed Australia-wide and are displayed in health clinics, Aboriginal organisations and other related organisations. For copies of the poster, please contact wacha@uwa.edu.au.

The brain painting: “the snake eating away the life of your memory”

Listening to what Indigenous people in remote communities say about alcohol restrictions and cannabis use: ‘Good thing that the alcohol’s gone, but the gunja has kept going

Incorrect authorship: In “Listening to what Indigenous people in remote communities say about alcohol restrictions and cannabis use: ‘Good thing that the alcohol’s gone, but the gunja has kept going’ ” in the 3 September 2012 issue of the Journal (Med J Aust 2012; 197: 275), it was incorrectly stated that Alan Clough was the sole author of this letter. Due to space constraints in the print version of the Journal and Journal policy concerning the authorship of letters, the members of the Cape York Cannabis Project team who co-authored the letter were not individually named in the original publication as co-authors of the letter. We wish to name these co-authors individually. They are: Susan Jacups, Jan Robertson, Bernadette Rogerson and Veronica Graham.

Lip lupus erythematosus

Clinical record

A 40-year-old Indigenous Australian woman was referred to an outreach dermatology clinic in the Top End of the Northern Territory for assessment of painful lip ulceration of 2 years’ duration. She had been reviewed 16 months earlier in a distant regional centre, and a diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma of the lip had been proposed. Skin biopsy had not been performed and the patient had refused a planned extensive surgical excision of the lip lesion at that assessment. Her general health was good.

Examination at the outreach clinic showed extensive and bilateral lower lip exophytic ulceration and crusting (Box 1). The upper lip and other cutaneous and oral surfaces were normal.

Lower lip skin biopsy samples were taken from the ulcer and adjacent lower lip mucosa to confirm a clinical diagnosis of lupus erythematosus and to exclude malignancy (Box 2). The hyperkeratotic squamous epithelium ranged from atrophic to acanthotic, with foci of lichenoid basal vacuolar damage resulting in squamous cell apoptosis and colloid bodies.

The submucosa contained a dense mixed inflammatory cell infiltrate of lymphocytes, histiocytes, plasma cells and melanophages. Direct immunofluorescence investigation showed weak (1+) granular IgM and complement component 3 positivity along the junctional region. No squamous dysplasia or malignancy was identified.

The results of blood testing, including antinuclear antibody testing, extractable nuclear antigen and DNA-antibody studies, were negative. Serum complement levels were normal. The patient was instructed to reduce lip sun exposure, apply broad-spectrum sunscreen twice daily and apply betamethasone dipropionate cream (0.5 mg/g) daily. On review 3 months later, there was a dramatic resolution of pain and ulceration. In the absence of any clinical or histological suggestion of malignancy, surgical treatment was not indicated or anticipated.

Lip and oral ulceration may be a feature of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) or a manifestation of cutaneous discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE).1 Various studies have suggested a high incidence and prevalence of both SLE and DLE in Indigenous Australian populations, with both forms mostly affecting women.26 We have treated many patients with DLE on the lower lip, both as a solitary disease manifestation and as part of more disseminated cutaneous disease. In most cases the diagnosis had not been suspected by treating health practitioners. DLE needs to be considered as a potential cause for lip symptoms and ulceration in this situation, with differential diagnoses including infections (eg, candidiasis, syphilis and streptococcal infection), lichen planus, fixed drug reactions and actinic malignancies.

Clinical features that may prompt suspicion of lip DLE include red, friable and delicate skin in early phases, with progression to erosions, ulceration, crusting and pigment loss with time and chronicity.6 The reason for a seemingly higher rate of SLE and DLE in Indigenous Australians compared with non-Indigenous Australians is unclear. However, genetic predisposition (human leukocyte antigen and complement pathway associations) and prior infective and environmental (sunlight) triggers have been hypothesised.24

DLE has characteristic histological features on skin biopsy,1 but selection of sites for biopsy is critical as epithelial destruction in areas of ulceration may result in loss of diagnostic findings.7 Clear communication to the pathologist about the purpose of the biopsy is essential, specifically whether exclusion of malignancy or confirmation of DLE is desired. For confirmation of suspected DLE, biopsy of clinically abnormal skin adjacent to but not involving areas of ulceration is recommended. If malignancy is suspected, taking multiple biopsies of the most indurated lesional skin is appropriate. Testing by direct immunofluorescence may be helpful but is less reliable than histopathological assessment in the diagnosis of DLE, with low sensitivity.7,8 Additionally, sun-exposed skin from healthy patients often shows false positive results of immunofluorescence testing.9 There is an increased rate of squamous cell carcinoma in lesions of DLE,7 with epithelial dysplasia on biopsy reported as the prime indicator of risk of malignant transformation.10 An awareness of this association should prompt detailed searching and reporting of cytological atypia during histopathological assessment.

Management priorities for lip DLE include precise diagnosis, exclusion of systemic involvement and identification of triggers (including medications). In most patients with DLE the prognosis is good, with progression to SLE being uncommon.1 Methods to reduce ultraviolet exposure on affected areas, including seeking shade, direct sun avoidance and regular sunscreen use, are essential. Potent topical corticosteroid application will often bring about rapid improvement. If general and topical therapies fail, the patient’s adherence should be reviewed. If systemic treatment is required, oral hydroxychloroquine is initially recommended.1

An awareness that the lower lip is a common site for lupus erythematosus, particularly in Indigenous Australian patients, will facilitate early diagnosis and appropriate management. A comprehensive lupus erythematosus database, including epidemiological, clinical, serological and outcome measures, is being established at Royal Darwin Hospital to provide further insights and enable statistical analysis.

1 Lupus erythematosus of the lower lip, with ulceration and crusting of 2 years’ duration, in a 40-year-old Indigenous woman

2 Lower lip skin biopsy image* showing lichenoid cheilitis with vacuolar basal epithelial damage, lymphocyte exocytosis, epithelial atrophy and an intense inflammatory infiltrate

* Magnification × 100; sample stained with haematoxylin and eosin. No squamous dysplasia is present.

Lessons from practice

  • Lower lip ulceration and thickening is commonly caused by lupus erythematosus in northern Australia

  • There is a high incidence of both systemic and cutaneous lupus erythematosus in Indigenous Australians

  • Careful and informed skin biopsy technique and interpretation of histopathological findings are critical in differentiating causes of lower lip symptoms