×

Let’s get physical  

 

Physical activity is one of the core elements of the Federal Government’s new national sport plan, Sport 2030, which was launched at the National Press Club by Sports Minister, Senator Bridget McKenzie.

Sport 2030 is being promoted as a comprehensive plan to reshape the face of Australian sport and build a healthier, more physically active nation.

The objective is to get more Australians more active, more often, drive sporting excellence and success, safeguard the integrity of sport, and strengthen the sports industry.

It will position sport and physical activity through the next decade and beyond for all Australians and reflects the Government’s strong commitment to link sport, physical activity, and preventive health.

Under Sport 2030, the Government will reframe sport policy to include physical activity, as well as organised and high-performance sport, and commit to reducing inactivity among Australians by 15 per cent by 2030.

This will mean that participation in sport and physical activity will be ramped up across the country, so every Australian can be either playing sport, be part of it, or engaged in healthy, active living.

More consultation needed on Gold, Silver, Bronze, and Basic policies, AMA tells Senate Committee

The AMA has called for more consultation on proposed private health insurance reforms, arguing that the changes will need to work with the Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) Review, which is still underway.

AMA President, Dr Tony Bartone, told a Senate inquiry into the Gold, Silver, Bronze, and Basic system that the AMA supports standard clinical definitions, as coverage for a condition should not vary between insurers and policies.

“Standard clinical definitions are one policy lever to stop this,” Dr Bartone said.

“But to make them work, we need to engage with each specialty within the medical profession.

“Right now, the Government has released the private health insurance rules for comment. They have done this before the Senate has finished its deliberations, before this legislation is finalised.

“These rules outline what the Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) items are that ‘sit behind’ the definitions.

“More time is needed on this critical work. It would be wise for there to be more consultation and a better outline of how these reforms will work in tandem with the MBS Review, which is of course updating all these items and their descriptors.”

Dr Bartone said the AMA welcomed the decision not to allow restrictions in the Gold, Silver, and Bronze policies, and acknowledged the effort the Government is going to, in order to make private health insurance more affordable for younger Australians.

But he urged the Government to be careful.

“We don’t support dismantling community rating. This must be protected to maintain equity of access to private health treatment,” Dr Bartone said.

The AMA is disappointed that pregnancy cover has been limited to Gold policies, he said.

“It does not make sense to us, as clinicians, to have pregnancy cover in a higher level of insurance only,” he said.

“Many pregnancies are unplanned, meaning people are caught out underinsured when pregnancy is restricted to high-end policies.

“Pregnancy is a major reason that the younger population considers taking up private health insurance.

“They are less likely to be able to afford the higher-level policies. We need to make sure it is within reach.”

The Senate Committee was due to report on 13 August.

Maria Hawthorne

The Bartone Ultimatum: “Fix My Health Record”

During a private twilight meeting in Melbourne three weeks ago, AMA President, Dr Tony Bartone, put a strong demand directly to Health Minister Greg Hunt – fix the privacy provisions of the legislation or the My Health Record (MyHR) will remain in limbo for years to come.

Dr Bartone had made public his intentions a week earlier at the National Press Club in Canberra when he declared to journalists that he would do ‘whatever it takes’ to force the Government to take action to make the privacy protections of health information as watertight as possible in the digital health age.

The new AMA President stayed true to his word.

With the blessing and support of the AMA Federal Council, Dr Bartone, a Melbourne GP, took a four-point shopping list to the Minister – amend the Act to ensure health data is not disclosed without a warrant or court order; ensure that people who opt-out do not end up with a permanent MyHR; run a public information campaign; and extend the opt-out period.

The Minister, wanting the controversy to end, and ultimately wanting the MyHR to succeed, agreed to all the items and, after obtaining a sign-off from the Prime Minister, he issued a media release to publicly confirm the actions to be taken.

Minister Hunt said the Government will strengthen privacy provisions under the My Health Record Act, and the legislation will be strengthened to match the existing Australian Digital Health Agency (ADHA) policy.

“This policy requires a court order to release any My Health Record information without consent,” Minister Hunt said.

“The amendment will ensure no record can be released to police or government agencies, for any purpose, without a court order.”

Dr Bartone told ABC Radio AM that “we can now move forward and have certainty around the protections to the privacy of those medical records that our patients expect when they confide their information with us”.

“The assurance that people who opt-out will have their records deleted will hopefully appease concerns in that area,” Dr Bartone said.

“The privacy protection of our records and the security protection of our records is of considerable and paramount importance to us.

“We have protocols and procedures in place. We work with our IT providers to ensure that everything is in compliance and in the utmost preparedness for any cyber attack that we can envisage,” Dr Bartone said.

The AMA will examine the amended legislation carefully to ensure that patient, community, and professional concerns are addressed satisfactorily.

Dr Bartone said that the AMA remains committed to the potential clinical benefits of an electronic health record, but the future of the record depends on getting the security and privacy settings right.

“It would be a tragedy if, after more than a decade of development, we have to go back to square one in building a secure and workable electronic health record.”

Despite Minister Hunt’s announcement, the Labor Opposition is calling for the My Health Record system to be suspended until privacy concerns can be allayed.

Shadow Health Minister, Catherine King, raised concerns that non- custodial parents could create records for their children and use them to locate their children and estranged partners.

“The Government needs to deal with this issue,” Ms King said.


 

John Flannery

Aged Care Survey reveals trends in practitioner visits and patient contact

The latest AMA Aged Care Survey Report has been released, with results providing insight into the perceptions and priorities of members in providing medical care in the aged care sector.

Conducted in late 2017, the survey sought feedback from AMA members, and was released in July this year.

Because older Australians living in Residential Aged Care Facilities (RACFs) require a high level of medical care, many of the questions focused on medical access in RACFs.

In 2017, there was significant aged care system review by the Federal Government and consultation with stakeholders regarding the quality of care older Australians receive – therefore, quality of care questions were included, in order for the AMA to accurately understand members’ current views.

This survey revealed that, since the last survey in 2015, medical practitioner visits have increased by 1.2 visits (from 7.4 to 8.6 visits per month) while the average number of patients seen per visit has remained relatively similar, with only a slight increase of 0.1 patients per visit (from 6.5 to 6.6 patients per visit).

However, the average reported non-contact time on each patient seen (13 minutes 35 seconds) has decreased since 2015 (17 minutes 30 seconds), although is similar to the 2012 average (13 minutes 54 seconds).

Although non-contact time has decreased, several members remain concerned about non-contact time demands, commenting on the considerable amount of paperwork involved, responding to faxes and phone calls, and discussing issues with RACF staff or relatives of residents.

This has been a common concern for respondents of all the surveys and was listed as a major influence to decrease visits to, or never visit, RACFs.

All surveys indicate an increased demand for RACF-visiting medical practitioners. The average reported time spent on each patient has increased since previous years.

“The 2017 survey saw an average of 17 minutes 7 seconds spent on each patient, while in 2012 and 2015 the average was 16 minutes 6 seconds and 16 minutes 12 seconds, respectively,” the report states.

“This indicates that, although the number of patients seen per visit remains the same, medical practitioners are making more visits to RACFs and spending slightly more time with each patient.”

Respondents aged 41-60 remain the largest age group reporting they visit RACFs (46.94 per cent) and contributing to the highest proportion of monthly visits (49.32 per cent).

Respondents aged 61 and over contribute to 47.11 per cent of monthly RACF visits, and those aged 40 or under contribute to only 3.57 per cent.

“This raises concerns that as the older age groups move into retirement, there could be a shortage of medical practitioners willing to visit patients in RACFs,” the report states.

“Respondents were asked of their intentions to visit RACFs over the next two years. Over one third (35.67 per cent) of respondents who currently undertake RACF visits intend to either visit current patients but not visit new patients, decrease the number of visits, or stop visiting RACFs altogether.”


CHRIS JOHNSON

Asylum Seeker Death was Preventable

The Queensland Coroner has found that the death of Iranian asylum seeker, Hamid Khazei, was preventable.

In a ruling released on 30 July, the Coroner, Terry Ryan, said: “Consistent with the evidence of the expert witnesses who assisted the court in this matter, I am satisfied that if Mr Khazaei’s clinical deterioration was recognised and responded to in a timely way at the MIRPC clinic, and he was evacuated to Australia within 24 hours of developing severe sepsis, he would have survived.”

Coroner Ryan said it would be possible to characterise the circumstances that led to Mr Khazaei’s death simply as a series of clinical errors, compounded by failures in communication that led to poor handovers and significant delays in his retrieval from Manus Island.

“However, attributing responsibility for those events solely on failures by individual clinicians tasked with his care and others responsible for arranging his transfer from Manus Island is not helpful when looking for ways to prevent similar deaths from happening in future,” the coroner said.

“It is important to consider the broader context in which Mr Khazaei’s death occurred in order to find ways to prevent similar incidents.”

AMA (NSW) President, Dr Kean-Seng Lim, said the Federal Government should accept and implement the recommendations of the Queensland Coroner as soon as possible.

“The first recommendation in the Queensland Coroner’s report is that the health and wellbeing of asylum seekers who need a medical transfer be made the overriding consideration,” Dr Lim said.

“This should have been standard practice before, but it is imperative that the Department for Home Affairs develop and implement this policy now.

“The report also recommends the clinics providing medical services to asylum seekers in regional processing countries be properly accredited.

“Once again, this is something that should have always been the case and needs to be acted on with all haste.

“This is especially important given the description of the initial treating facility Mr Khazaei encountered.

“It has been longstanding AMA policy that asylum seekers should be afforded the same level of care that can be expected in Australia,” Dr Lim said.

AMA members honoured in Mongolia

Last month, in a private audience with the Mongolian President, four Australian doctors were awarded the Mongolian Silver Friendship Medal (Nairamdal).

Medical specialists, and AMA members – Dr Kym Jansen, Dr Emma Readman, Dr Samantha Hargreaves, and Dr Philip Popham – were honoured for their contribution to health care in Mongolia.

The Medal is the highest honour bestowed upon a foreign citizen by the Mongolian Government, and is solely given to foreigners who have contributed to strengthening the collaboration between their country and Mongolia through their work.

These four doctors are the first Australians to be awarded the Friendship Medal. Dr Elizabeth Farrell AM, a member of the same group, was awarded a visiting Professorship from the Mongolian National University of Medical Sciences.

These amazing doctors have been visiting Mongolia annually for the past 10 years.

The group initially concentrated on promoting minimally invasive gynaecological surgery, but recently expanded their role to encompass all aspects of women’s health, including anaesthetic care. The affiliation has seen rapid advances in surgical, anaesthetic, and obstetric care.

Over the last two years, the Epworth Foundation has expanded this project by funding three-month scholarships for two doctors from Mongolia to visit Australia annually.

The group has recently formed the Mongolian Australian Medical Affiliation (MAMA) – Women’s Health, and plan to continue their collaboration.

*In Photo are left to right: Dr Samantha Hargreaves, Dr Philip Popham, Dr Emma Readman, Dr Kym Jansen, Mongolian President, Khaltmaagiin Buttulga and Dr Elizabeth Farrell

Doctors warn Aussies will pay more for less health care

Specialist physicians have sounded a warning that thousands of Australians face a lifetime of chronic pain and second-rate treatment options under the Federal Government’s private healthcare reform.
A group of concerned spine surgeons and other medical practitioners say the proposed policy bands of Gold, Silver, Bronze and Basic will leave thousands of patients having to choose between the spine surgery they need and the one they can afford.
Gold Coast orthopaedic surgeon Associate Professor Matthew Scott-Young said spine surgery was split between Gold and Silver bands under the reforms, with spinal stabilisation and fusion restricted to the top level of cover.
“Splitting funding for spinal conditions between Silver and Gold will result in a patient’s level of private health cover influencing clinical decision making,” Associate Professor Scott-Young said.
“Surgeons will be pressured into offering, and patients will be obliged to accept, suboptimal care based on their level of cover.”
Assoc Prof Scott-Young said the reforms would cause more people to live with chronic pain or to opt for less effective treatments simply because they were the ones they could afford.
“It will increase pressure on the already over-burdened public health system and, ultimately, lead to an increase in the impact of spine disease within the Australian community,” he said.
“There is level one evidence to show spinal fusion is the most effective treatment for a number of elective and emergency spinal conditions. Add to that our 20 years and 6000 patients worth of Patient Reported Outcome Measures data which demonstrates spinal fusion patients have clinically significant reduction in symptoms, with an overwhelming majority able to return to enjoying their everyday activities.”
Federal Health Minister Greg Hunt announced last week that the changes were to ‘empower’ the 13 million Australians with private health insurance by providing a simplified summary of their cover on a single page. Mr Hunt also said the reforms, effective from 1 April 2019, would not lead to a change in policies or a rise in price for private health customers. Private health insurers currently offer top hospital cover as well as spine fusion from as little as $42.70 a week.
Numerous professional medical associations lodged submissions to the Federal Government during its consultation process, highlighting risks and problems with the proposed changes. Concerns about splitting the treatment of a single condition across different levels of cover formed the focus of many submissions. A further round of consultation is underway with submissions due on August 3, 2018.
Dr Bill Sears, Immediate Past President of the Spine Society of Australia and a Sydney-based neurosurgeon, said health fund coverage for spinal surgery should be an all or nothing proposition – you should either be covered, or you should not.
“Australians who choose to take out cover for private spinal surgery are entitled to feel confident that they will receive the procedure that is best suited to their problem,” Dr Sears said. “Things may change at the time of surgery; patients must be assured that they are covered for whatever eventuates and that their care will not be compromised.
Their surgeon shouldn’t have one hand tied behind his or her back.”
Sydney neurosurgeon Dr Marc Coughlan warned the reforms could have ‘draconian consequences’ on thousands of Australians.
“It would potentially impact the lives of thousands of patients who would be precluded from having spinal fusions because of the high costs of the prostheses,” he said.
“Many of these people are younger patients with spinal conditions impacting on their ability to walk, work and remain productive in the workforce.
“My concern is that practitioners will be forced to opt for less effective procedures that in many cases will ultimately lead to multiple operations and increased costs.”
Sydney neurosurgeon Associate Professor Ralph Mobbs said the millions of Australians who have paid for private health insurance for decades – in the face of annual premium increases – deserved to receive the coverage they had been promised.
“Those who have invested for private health insurance for years have a legitimate right to expect the treatments they previously had for the same premium,” Dr Mobbs said.
An estimated 3.7 million Australians have chronic back problems and more than $1 billion in total health care expenditure in Australia is attributed to the condition, according to the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW).

In a 2017 report, AIHW found back pain and back problems were the third leading cause of disease burden in Australia.
Gold Coast spine surgeon Assistant Professor Laurence McEntee said public hospitals would feel the weight of thousands of spine surgery patients who were no longer able to receive the care they needed in the private system under the reforms.
“There were about 12,000 people who had spinal fusions in the private system in the past year,” he said. “Offering spinal fusion only in the most expensive level of private health cover will trigger a massive cost shift to state governments because we will see a drastic increase in the number of people moving to the public system for treatment
where there are already waiting lists of up to three years for spine surgery in some regions.”

Poor and elderly Australians let down by ailing primary health system

Primary care services are usually our first point of contact with the health system. Each year, about A$50 billion – nearly a third of all health expenditure – is spent on more than 400 million primary care services delivered by more than 90,000 providers. This includes GPs, pharmacists, dentists, podiatrists and maternal and child health nurses.

Although by world standards Australia has an extensive set of primary care services, the Grattan Institute’s new report, Mapping Primary Care, finds too many poorer Australians still can’t afford to go to a GP when they need to, or a dentist when they should.

Beyond the cost issues, Australia’s primary care system is fragmented and poorly coordinated, and is ripe for reform.

High out-of-pocket costs

About 4% of Australians delay seeing a GP because of cost. About 7% delay or do not fill their prescriptions.

About one-third of patients pay for GP services at least once a year, with an average out-of-pocket cost of around A$34. If a GP prescribes medication, non-concessional patients pay up to A$39.50. Together with the GP consultation, this quickly adds up to A$75 or more for those who are not bulk billed.

Out-of-pocket costs are higher again for allied health and specialist medical practitioners. On average, allied health practitioners charge A$40 to the patient and specialists A$75. About 8% of people delay seeing a specialist because of cost.

Cost is an even bigger problem for dental services. Around 18% of Australians delay seeing a dentist because of this. More than half of six-year-olds and one-third of adults have tooth decay.

Not surprisingly, out-of-pocket costs are a bigger problem for people on low incomes. One-quarter of those on the lowest incomes delay or do not see a dentist because of cost.

Rural shortages

People who need to see a GP, allied health practitioner, dentist or specialist medical practitioner are less likely to do so if they live in a rural location, due to workforce shortages.

There are half as many GPs, 25% as many allied health services and 20% as many specialist medical services per person in remote rural areas as in major cities.

Compounding the problem, state government-funded primary care and specialist community services (including alcohol and drug, mental health and public dental services) often have capped budgets. When the budget runs out, people have to wait for services. People who need public dental services, for example, often wait a year or more.

Poor coordination

About 20% of Australians have ongoing complex care needs and need services from GPs, specialists, pharmacists, nurses, allied health and home support.

GPs are often seen as the gatekeepers and coordinators of care, particularly for people with greater needs, such as a combination of chronic diseases like diabetes, arthritis, depression, cancer and heart disease.

People with late-stage diabetes, for example, often have heart disease, kidney disease and poor circulation in their hands and feet. They may need a combination of ongoing medication, dialysis, wound management and support at home.

Coordination should help people with complex needs navigate the healthcare system to get the right care at the right time. But only 60% of this group see GPs as their main care coordinator. Nearly one-third of people who saw three or more health professionals say they have no care coordinator.

Lack of coordination can lead to difficulties in communication and frustrating experiences for patients. If treatment for people with advanced diabetes is not well managed, for instance, they are more likely to have kidney failure, a heart attack or lose a foot or a leg through amputation.

Poor coordination often reduces the quality of care patients get and leads to treatment, including hospitalisation, that could be avoided.

Fragmented care

Much of primary care is delivered by small, privately owned professional practices working independently of one another. They operate next to a range of relatively small non-government and state-run agencies providing primary care and specialist community services.

The Commonwealth government is meant to be responsible for managing primary care, but the states continue to have responsibility for a range of primary care and specialist community services.

The result is that responsibility for policy, planning, funding, data collection, organisation and management is fragmented, ineffective and inefficient.

Access and the integration and coordination of services for patients suffer as a result. In rural areas, poor policy and planning means patients have to travel long distances to see allied health professionals like physiotherapists or psychologists, or to see specialist medical practitioners like psychiatrists and dermatologists.

It’s time for the Commonwealth and state governments to negotiate a comprehensive national primary care policy framework to address the funding and organisational shortfalls.

We need a plan to provide better long-term care for the increasing number of older Australians who live with complex and chronic conditions, and to help keep populations healthy in the first place.

This article was published by The Conversation. Read the original version here.

 


[Commission] Time to deliver: report of the WHO Independent High-Level Commission on NCDs

The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, with its pledge to leave no one behind, is our boldest agenda for humanity. It will require equally bold actions from Heads of State and Government. They must deliver on their time-bound promise to reduce, by one-third, premature mortality from NCDs through prevention and treatment and promote mental health and wellbeing.