×

Election 2016 – what the major parties say

Health, as befits one of the major functions of Government, is shaping as a key battleground in the 2016 Federal Election.

In its first term in office, the Coalition Government has left no area of health policy untouched. Medicare rebates have been frozen, there is a thoroughgoing review of 5700 MBS items underway, Medicare Locals have been replaced by Primary Health Networks, Health Care Homes and the My Health Record are being trialled, national agreements on public hospital funding were abandoned as part of plans to renegotiate the Federation, and the role of the private sector, especially health insurers, in providing health services is being examined.

These changes have come against the backdrop of steadily increasing demand for health services. Advances in health care and medicine have meant that Australians are living longer than ever, and as lives extend, the number of patients living with multiple chronic health conditions has risen. Caring for these patients is imposing ever-increasing demands on GPs, specialists and hospitals.

Coincidentally, advances in medical science are delivering new and more effective treatments that are saving and improving lives – but often at a hefty cost.

In this Australian Medicine special, each of Health Minister Sussan Ley, Shadow Health Minister Catherine King, and Australian Greens leader Senator Richard Di Natale lays out their broad vision for health policy.

These should be seen as their first, rather than final, word on health during this Federal Election, and Australian Medicine will provide comprehensive coverage of the detailed policy pronouncements as they are made during the course of one of the longest campaigns in Australia’s recent political history.

Health Minister Sussan Ley

Building a 21st century health system for all Australians

The health policy directions we have outlined in the recent Federal Budget are underpinned by a key and very important objective; to ensure patients and consumers are at the centre of all our decision making.

Ultimately, we are all here to ensure patients have a better health outcome, and this can only be achieved by working together to make sure our service delivery is well-integrated, efficient and focused.

It is well documented that the Commonwealth needs to spend its health dollar wisely, landing that funding as close to patients as possible.

Simply throwing more money at the system is tantamount to ‘placebo policy’: it may make some feel better but it won’t treat the cause.   

In the last 12 months, through the Council of Australian Governments, (COAG), every State and Territory has had significant input into what the primary and health care sector needs to look like in coming years.

Central to these discussions is our desire to reduce the barrier patients face across a fragmented system, with an aim of keeping people well at home and, where possible, out of hospital.

Since becoming Health Minister, I have consulted widely with many of you on the ground, and we are now undertaking important reforms like Health Care Homes, not only because it is the right policy but as a show faith for your co-operation and support in this process.

Health Care Homes will trial a new way of funding chronic and complex care, which will ensure patients receive integrated, coordinated care to better meet their needs.

It’s important to note in addition to the $21 million already committed to complete trials over two years, bundled payment models during this period will be funded as certain Chronic Disease Management MBS items and cashed out to support this initiative.

Moving closer to a national rollout, we will obviously assess what further funds may be required in consultation with you and your representatives.

There are a number of other integrated reforms that we are undertaking to help build a Healthier Medicare and put patients first.

Our clinician-led review of all 5700 items on the MBS is also progressing steadily, under the careful consideration and advice of your peers.

At the most recent COAG, it was agreed an additional $2.9 billion in Commonwealth investment for public hospitals was required for ongoing needs, but with a greater focus on patient outcomes, quality and safety, particularly for those being treated for a chronic illness.

All children and concession card holders will now be eligible for affordable access to dental care through a new national public dental scheme, which will see the Commonwealth double its contribution towards frontline public dental services from July this year.

Australians with mental health issues will also begin receiving the integrated care they need from 1 July, as we begin trialing new once-a-new generation reforms providing patients with personalised care packages.

Our world-class Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme gives Australians access to affordable medicines, with the Government’s reforms saving patients as much as $20 per script on common everyday medicines, with further price cuts to come.

We’ve also ensured savings to taxpayers are being reinvested in new innovative medicines, with the Turnbull Government making nearly 1000 listings on the PBS over the past three years – triple that of the previous Government.

This includes our watershed commitment of over $1 billion to eradicate hepatitis C within a generation.

This is being supported by new reforms announced in the Budget, allowing patients to get faster access to life-saving medicines and medical devices up to two years earlier, by breaking down international trade barriers and red tape.

We are actively working to protect and increase immunisation rates against deadly and debilitating viruses, with incentives for GPs to catch up overdue children, a national all-age vaccination register and ‘no-jab, no pay’ deterrents.

Also, with an eye to the future, we want patients to find it easier to navigate the health system through the digital ‘My Health Record’, which will allow everything from a patient storing prescription information, through to doctors having life-saving access to someone’s allergies in a medical emergency. 

There are many more initiatives, and I encourage you to visit www.health.gov.au to find out more at

Can I take this opportunity to acknowledge your outgoing AMA President, Professor Brian Owler. While we have not always arrived at the same position in relation to health policy, I acknowledge his fierce advocacy on behalf of the AMA and its members.

I look forward to a collegial working relationship with his forthcoming successor and hope we can work together to develop policies which ensure every dollar ‘works’ in a constrained budgetary environment.

The Turnbull Government also appreciates the efforts of many GPs to keep costs down during the current Medicare rebate indexation pause, which was first introduced under the previous Government back in 2013-14.

I would like to reaffirm my commitment to the possibility of a review of this pause as further improvements and inefficiencies are identified through our Healthier Medicare reforms.

In closing, be assured across all areas of the health sector I continue to have an open ear, open door approach, and welcome constructive dialogue in balancing our joint desire to maintain and build a progressive health system for all Australians.

My email is Minister.Ley@health.gov.au if you would ever like to raise any ideas or questions.

 

Shadow Health Minister Catherine King

General practice is the heart of Medicare and deserves respect

One of the most disappointing aspects of Malcolm Turnbull’s election manifesto is its continuing attack on primary care.

After being devalued in the Coalition’s first two Budgets by the GP Tax and then the four year freeze, the profession could have been forgiven for hoping a change of leader marked a change in approach to general practice.

Sadly, as we now know, this was not the case, and the shock decision to extend the freeze out to six years effectively signals that under the Coalition, Medicare rebates are now effectively locked at their current rates.

The signal this sends is that the Coalition does not value general practice, and does not believe the services rendered by GPs are worth being properly renumerated for.

I can give you an assurance that Labor most emphatically does not share this view, and a Shorten Labor Government will place general practice at the forefront of Australia’s healthcare system.

By the time voters go to the polls, our health policy will leave the profession and their patients in no doubt about the contrast between Labor’s respect for general practice, and the Coalition’s approach of the last three years.

That is because Labor believes general practice is the heart of Medicare, acting as the first line of preventive health care, catching and managing illness and disease before far worse outcomes lead to greater costs for both patients and the health system.

Indeed, all of the evidence internationally is that the stronger a country’s primary health care system, the better its health outcomes are. 

We know from a number of studies that “health systems with strong primary health care are more efficient, have lower rates of hospitalisation, fewer health inequalities and better health outcomes including lower mortality, than those that do not”.

That is why, when last in Government, Labor did introduce a number of measures to improve general practice, including continuing incentives that improved access and increased bulk billing rates; being properly renumerated for the treatment of chronic disease; provided incentive payments for the treatment of practice nurses and a number of other measures.

But as we look to the future of general practice, we are also conscious of the way Medicare has evolved over more than 30 years now.

No serious health expert disputes the need for Australia’s health system to better manage patients with chronic conditions, and Labor welcomes the proposals of the Primary Health Care Advisory Group to better manage the care of the one-in-five Australians living with two or more chronic health conditions.

Last year’s OECD Health Care Quality Review warned Australia’s ageing population will lead to a growing burden of chronic disease, and highlighted the need for greater investment in primary care to tackle the rise in chronic disease.

But unlike the current Government, a Shorten Labor Government will pay more than lip service to general practice being central to care coordination, as will be made clear in our primary care policy.

Labor understands these reforms can only be achieved in co-operation with doctors, and that co-operation can never succeed if the profession is constantly blindsided by Budget night surprise raids and politically inspired attacks on the integrity of doctors.

I know doctors want to be a major part of the solution.

So too does Labor, and if Labor is elected to Government I can assure you we would want to be advised by you as GPs about what the best system should look like, and how patients can best be looked after.

 

Australian Greens leader Dr Richard Di Natale

Investing in health care

The Greens believe good health care is an investment, not a cost. As a wealthy country we are lucky to have the opportunity and the means to make high-quality healthcare available to everyone.

Of course we should always seek to ensure we get the best value for our money, but as effective new treatments become available we believe securing affordable, universal access should be the objective.

Spending that leads to better health outcomes and longer lives represents good value for money, and should be prioritised. Australia’s health spending is not unusual by comparable global standards. Among OECD countries, the average spend on health is about 9 per cent of gross domestic product – not much different from where Australia sits now. By contrast, the European average is greater than 11 per cent, and the United States spends 17.1 per cent of GDP on health in a system that delivers worse outcomes.

And yet under this Government, which sees health merely as a cost to the bottom line, the harsh cuts continue. This year’s Budget has seen the Government extend the freeze on indexation of the MBS. This is a co-payment by stealth, which we recognise will force doctors to make a difficult choice about passing on the costs to patients, knowing that hitting patients will almost certainly lead to avoidable and costly presentations to hospital in some cases.

Deeper cuts to the Flexible Funds, with still no certainty about where the axe will fall, is leaving providers of essential services vulnerable and patients at risk.

There is so much to do to extend true universal access to all, including in particular to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians whose health outcomes continue to lag behind the rest of the nation. We need secure, targeted investment, not cutbacks, and it was a huge disappointment to see the Government commit no funding at all for the Implementation Plan of the National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Plan in this year’s Budget.  

The Greens believe in a system which meets the challenges of changing demographics and rising chronic disease. It is time for a real plan for the future of our primary care system, which puts patients at the centre of their care, with continuity of care and appropriate funding. The Government’s Healthcare Homes plan risks this important reform by under-resourcing the trial.

The Greens have long championed the Denticare scheme, believing that the mouth should be treated like any other part of the body in terms of access to the health system. We continue support its expansion, seeking universal dental care for all Australians over time.

Spending more on health care is not unsustainable – it is a matter of priorities, and the Greens choose to prioritise good health care.

The Greens are committed to maintaining a health care system that is publicly funded, of the highest quality, and available to all. We want Australians to have access to the latest drugs and treatments that medical science has to offer. All Australians, no matter where they live, should share equally in the benefits of our health system.

The Greens will be announcing a suite of fully costed health policies throughout the election campaign, setting out our vision for the health system in Australia. We encourage AMA members to watch out for our announcements – which will provide a positive, equitable plan for the future.

 

 

 

[Comment] Offline: The 500-year old cause of the doctors’ strike

For the first time in the history of the UK’s National Health Service (NHS), junior doctors went on strike twice last week. They withdrew their labour from emergency and intensive care, in protest at the UK Government’s decision to impose a new employment contract. Jeremy Hunt, the Conservative Secretary of State for Health, says repeatedly that junior doctors are “the backbone of the NHS”. But he also argues that the strike is not about health. It is, he says, about bringing his government down.

[Clinical Picture] An unusual medical cause of abdominal pain diagnosed by urological abnormalities

In February, 2014, a 14-year-old girl with no medical history presented to the emergency department with a 2 day history of severe abdominal pain associated with non-bilious vomiting. On examination she had pallor and diffuse abdominal tenderness with guarding and sluggish bowel sounds but no rigidity. She had haemoglobin 88 g/L, total leucocyte count 3·6 × 109/L, platelets 96 × 109/L, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) 54 mm/h. Urinalysis was normal and blood and urine cultures were sterile.

New cosmetic surgery guidelines encourage cooling off periods

The Medical Board of Australia has introduced a range of new guidelines in a bid to crackdown on the cosmetic surgery industry.

The guidelines aim to inform medical professionals and the community about the expectations the Board has for doctors who perform cosmetic surgery procedures.

According to Board Chair, Dr Joanna Flynn, “The guidelines will help keep patients safe, without imposing an unreasonable regulatory burden on practitioners.”

Related: Delay implants, women advised

The 6 page guidelines were developed after draft guidelines were circulated in March 2015.

“The Board listened to stakeholder feedback, and responded with a new set of guidelines that will best keep patients safe,” Dr Flynn said.

“The changes prioritise patient safety and reduce some of the regulatory requirements proposed in the previous draft guidelines, when either there was no evidence of improved safety or the costs significantly outweighed the benefits of a proposal,” she said.

Related: Cosmetic clinic under fire over surgeries

9 key points from the guidelines include:

  • There should be a 7 day cooling off period for all adults before any major procedure (anything that involves cutting beneath the skin);
  • Adult patients should be referred to a psychologist, psychiatrist or general practitioner if there are any indications of underlying psychological problems;
  • There should be a 3 month cooling off period for all under 18s before major procedures and a mandatory evaluation from a registered psychiatrist, psychologist or general practitioner;
  • There should be a 7 day cooling off period for all under 18s before minor procedures (cosmetic medical procedures that do not involve cutting beneath the skin but may involve piercing the skin);
  • The treating medical practitioner must take responsibility for any post-operative care;
  • The treating medical practitioner must make sure there are emergency facilities when using sedation, anaesthesia or analgesia;
  • There needs to be a mandatory consultation (either by person or by video conference) before medical practitioner prescribes schedule 4 cosmetic injectables;
  • Medical practioners need to provide detailed, written information to the patient to ensure they are making informed consent. Information should include the range of possible outcomes, complications and recovery times associated with the procedure and the qualifications and experience of the medical practioner;
  • Medical practitioners need to provide patients with detailed written information about costs including any costs for follow-up care or any potential revision surgery or treatment.

The new guidelines will take effect on 1 October 2016. Read the Cosmetic Surgery Guidelines.

Latest news:

[Correspondence] Positive IgM for Zika virus in the cerebrospinal fluid of 30 neonates with microcephaly in Brazil

The epidemic of microcephaly in Brazil has been declared a Public Health Emergency of International Concern by WHO.1 The declaration states that a causal relationship between Zika virus infection during pregnancy and microcephaly is strongly suspected, although not yet scientifically proven.1 The hesitancy to accept causation in the presence of much epidemiological circumstantial evidence is due to the paucity of laboratory confirmation of Zika virus in affected neonates. Here, we report the serological confirmation of Zika virus infection in the CNS of 30 neonates with microcephaly.

[Correspondence] Zika virus and hyperglycaemia in pregnancy

The spread of Zika virus has drawn the attention of the global public health arena. Reports from Brazil suggest a potential link with microcephaly,1 prompting WHO to declare Zika virus a Public Health Emergency of International Concern2 and The Lancet to term it “a new global threat for 2016”.3

Ladder-related injuries in New South Wales

Falls from ladders are a significant cause of serious injury and have been increasing in number across Australia.14 While occupational injuries involving ladders are being dealt with through WorkSafe initiatives, safer use of ladders in non-occupational settings is difficult to enforce because of the variety of behavioural factors that contribute to this type of injury.4,5

In this study, data containing the International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision, clinical modification code for “Fall on and from ladder (W11) for occupational and non-occupational injuries were extracted from the New South Wales Admitted Patients Data Collection (APDC, hospital admissions) and the NSW Trauma Registry between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2014. The APDC collects information on hospital stay across the state while the Trauma Registry prospectively collects a minimum dataset on major trauma (injury severity score > 12 and death in hospital regardless of injury severity) from 20 NSW trauma centres. Descriptive analyses were performed separately for each dataset in SAS statistical software (SAS Institute). All results are available online in the full report (http://www.aci.health.nsw.gov.au/networks/itim/projects/ladder-safety).

There were 8496 hospital admissions across NSW resulting from falls from ladders, giving an average of 1699 admissions annually. Peak admissions were seen in the 65–69-years age group, with 154 admissions per 100 000 persons, which is significantly higher than the crude rate of admissions due to falls from ladders in the population of 44 per 100 000 persons. The rate of admissions due to ladder-related falls is increasing in the 60–79-years age group (2.0% per annum) and in those aged 80 or more years (4.5% per annum), as illustrated in the Box. When considering only major trauma, there were 496 falls from ladders, predominantly by men aged 55 years or older, injured during non-occupational activities. Most injuries were to the thorax (36%) and head (29%), and most deaths resulted from head injuries (77% of deaths), and occurred in intensive care units (52% of deaths) or operating suites (31% of deaths). Patients were most commonly discharged home without assistance or to a rehabilitation facility. There were 51 recorded deaths following hospital admission, and 35 of these were considered due to major trauma. These findings are similar to those in Victoria.4

Hospital admission from ladder-related injuries was estimated to have cost the health system $51.8 million over the 5 years. This is based on the NSW state price, which allows calculation of the average cost of a patient’s stay per national weighted activity unit, a weighted measure of hospital activity that enables comparisons across a range of hospital settings. Use of hospital resources by patients with ladder-related injuries was high, with some 57 000 procedures being performed.

The strengths of this study include the use of two large statewide datasets with prospectively collected data. Weaknesses include the high percentage of unspecified falls and the lack of prehospital data (eg, deaths from ladder injuries before hospitalisation), which may have resulted in an underestimation of the true burden of this mechanism of injury.

Preventing ladder-related falls through safety campaigns and by providing services to older people for tasks requiring ladders is critical in ameliorating this emerging public health problem.

Box –
Age-specific rates of inpatient admissions for ladder falls in New South Wales in 2010 and 2014*


* From the New South Wales Admitted Patients Data Collection.

Kitesurfing — playing with water or with fire?

Kitesurfing is a relatively new water sport that converts wind energy into vertical and horizontal force using a large controllable kite. In optimal conditions, speeds of up to 65 km/h and heights of 20 m are reached.1,2 Impact at these speeds or from this height can lead to severe injuries or death,1 and such accidents have reinforced the image of kitesurfing as a highly dangerous and even reckless sport. Nonetheless, kitesurfing is rapidly gaining popularity and is among the fastest growing water sports worldwide.1

To quantify frequency, injury profiles and severity of kitesurfing-related trauma, we reviewed all patients presenting to the emergency department of the Royal Perth Hospital, Western Australia, with traumatic injuries received while kitesurfing between January 2000 and March 2014. Injury severity was graded using the Injury Severity Score (ISS).3 There were 56 presentations (47 men and nine women), with patient ages ranging from 18 to 69 years (mean ± SD, 34.1 ± 11.7). Forty-three patients were regarded as having minor trauma (ISS, 1–8), 12 moderate trauma (ISS, 9–15) and one major trauma (ISS ≥ 16). The lower extremities, upper extremities and spine (13/56) were the most frequently injured body regions (Box). Soft tissue injuries and fractures were the most common injury type. Internal organ injuries involved a renal laceration, a hepatic laceration and an injury to the posterior tibial artery following an open fracture. Neurological injuries involved brachial plexus injuries in two patients, and spinal injuries associated with spinal fractures in two patients. No paraplegias were observed. Of the 56 patients, 27 were hospitalised. Injury mechanisms included loss of kite control (25/56), mainly from unexpected gusts of wind (16/25) and failed jumps (5/25) resulting in falls from a height; injury from equipment, mainly sharp or blunt trauma from kiteboards (16/56); and impact against objects (eg, rocks, sandbanks) (5/56). One accident resulted from failure to detach after using the safety leash.

The low frequency of kitesurfing trauma that we found (about four cases annually) is consistent with previous studies that reported five and three trauma cases in periods of 1 year and 7 months, respectively.2,4 Injury rates of between 5.9 and 12.2 injuries per 1000 kitesurfing hours have been estimated in non-competitive kitesurfing, which is comparable to recreational skiing and lower than many popular contact sports.1 We found the lower extremities were most at risk, as in previous studies.1,5 Lower extremity and spinal fractures are the most common injuries in falls from a height;2 a common injury mechanism in kitesurfing. Head and facial injuries were slightly less frequent in our study than in an earlier study.5 This variability is likely attributable to the small sample sizes in both studies.

Despite its image as a dangerous sport, serious kitesurfing accidents seem uncommon. Severe injuries and deaths mostly result from unexpected gusts of wind causing impact against solid objects or falls from a height. Inability to release from the kite using the safety systems may also play a role.1,2,5 A detailed study into injury mechanisms in kitesurfing may identify areas for prevention strategies and minimise injuries and fatalities in this rapidly growing water sport.

Box –
Injury types and affected body regions in kitesurfing-related trauma (n = 56)

Injury type

Body region


Total

Head/face

Thorax

Abdomen

Spine

Upper extremity

Lower extremity


Soft tissue injury

5

3

0

4

15

15

33

Fracture

1

2

0

7

8

13

31

Internal organ injury

0

0

2

0

0

1

3

Neurological injury

0

0

0

2

2

0

4

Total

6

5

2

13

25

27


[Correspondence] Frailty in emergency departments

It is encouraging that recognition of frailty as a key element of the care of older people is entering the discourse of emergency medicine, as discussed by Elsa Dent and colleagues in their letter to The Lancet (Jan 30, p 434).1 Older patients (aged 65 years or older) not only represent an increasing proportion of patients presenting acutely to emergency departments, but are also the group most likely to present with care needs appropriate to emergency care.2

News briefs

Gender differences in pre-hospital care

A Swedish study published in BMC Emergency Medicine has found that female trauma patients were less likely to be given the highest pre-hospital priority, the highest pre-hospital competence level, and direct transport to the designated trauma centre compared with male trauma patients. A retrospective observational study based on local trauma registries and hospital and ambulance records in Stockholm County, Sweden, was conducted. A total of 383 trauma patients (279 males and 104 females) over 15 years of age with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) of more than 15 transported to emergency care hospitals in the Stockholm area were included. Male patients had a 2.75 higher odds ratio (95 % CI, 1.2–6.2) for receiving the highest pre-hospital priority compared with females on controlling for injury mechanism and vital signs on scene. “We found differences in trauma mechanism between genders, namely, that the second most common trauma mechanism for females was a low-energy fall (26.9 %) … Perhaps this might be one of the reasons why females, despite severe injury, are not recognised at scene as potential severe trauma patients since the trauma mechanism is considered to be of low energy. Recognising gender differences with educational efforts and in pre-hospital trauma management protocols may expedite the trauma care of female patients.”

Bad hair day in space for some astronauts

Research published in PLOS One has found that spaceflight alters human hair follicle gene expression, leading to a possible “inhibition of hair growth in space”, particularly among male astronauts. “We found that FGF18 expression in the hair follicle changed during spaceflight. Hair follicle growth during anagen is strongly suppressed by the local delivery of FGF18 protein. Epithelial FGF18 signaling and reduction of expression in the milieu of hair stem cells are crucial for the maintenance of resting and growth phases,” the authors wrote. They also found that “FGF18 expression is known to decrease in growing hair follicles; the increase in FGF18 expression in several astronauts during flight potentially reflects a temporary arrest in the hair growth cycle; FGF18 expression appears to be very sensitive to whether an astronaut is in space or earth-bound; FGF18 easily recovered to baseline levels after returning to Earth”. Gender also has its effect, they found. “Although there are many differences such as hormone levels or functions between males and females, female astronauts appear to have a better response against the features of the space environment, as one example, FGF18 expression in females was more stable in space than in males.”

FDA clears experimental Zika blood test for use

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has announced that it will allow the use of an experimental test to screen blood donations for contamination with the Zika virus, the New York Times reports. Puerto Rico, who had halted local blood donations and had imported almost 6000 units of blood from the US, will therefore be able to resume local collection. Zika poses a special challenge to blood banks, the report said, because roughly 80% of people who are infected do not have symptoms. “A handful of cases of Zika infection via blood transfusion have been reported in Brazil. During the 2013 French Polynesian outbreak, researchers found roughly 3% of asymptomatic blood donors actually tested positive for Zika infection, which they deemed unexpectedly high. It is not yet known how commonly recipients of Zika-contaminated blood end up infected, or how they fare.”

ASR hip replacement case settles for $250 million

Hundreds of Australians implanted with a defective hip device will be eligible for a share of $250 million in compensation following the conditional settlement of a long-running class action, the ABC reports. A worldwide recall of DePuy ASR devices in 2010 involved around 100 000 patients worldwide and 5500 in Australia, with approximately 1700 of those patients eligible for a share in the settlement. The settlement was negotiated after 17 weeks in court, but has yet to be approved by the Federal Court. A lawyer speaking on behalf of those bringing the class action said hundreds of Australian patients had yet to have revision surgery and they were welcome to join the class action which will remain open for a period. “There was no admission of liability by the makers of the ASR DePuy hip replacements as a part of the settlement.”