more_vert
AUSTRALIANS are keen home renovators, but it now seems that the great Aussie renovation dream may be contributing to a big Aussie nightmare.
Research published in the MJA provides evidence from WA that an increasing number of people are being diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma after exposure to asbestos during home renovation. Moreover, the latency period between exposure and disease seems, at this stage, to be shorter than that for other sources of exposure.
According to the researchers, two-thirds of older Australian homes were renovated between 1989 and 1999, and a study in one region found that almost three out of four houses built before 1965 contain asbestos in one form or another.
Consequently, it is not surprising that over 80% of respondents to an Australian survey (quoted by the researchers) believe that they have been exposed to asbestos at home or at work.
An accompanying editorial notes that Australia already has the highest rate of mesothelioma in the world. The editorial stresses the importance of maintaining accurate clinical data through the use of centralised mesothelioma registries, in the hope that these will sound both national and global warnings of the dangers of asbestos.
Although asbestos has essentially been banned as a building material in Australia and most of the world, it is still used in some of the most populated countries, such as China, India and Indonesia.
The editorial counsels that we need to be vigilant in maintaining awareness of the risks of asbestos exposure during home renovation, and laments that, to this day, there are no systematic warnings to ensure that people are aware of asbestos risks in their homes.
Given the widely publicised legal liability of the companies that were involved in the production and distribution of asbestos-related products, the lack of these warnings is mystifying.
All doctors, and indeed all Australians, need to be aware of this rise in the incidence of malignant mesothelioma associated with home renovation. It is fitting that this important issue is aired in the MJA.
* * *
THE latest issue of the MJA has a new look. I hope that you find the new layout attractive, engaging and readable.
We have added a news section, and increased our focus on commentary and opinion. Our internal processes have been revised to ensure that we bring you Australia’s best research and comment in the most timely way possible.
In particular, I wish to welcome our new specialist editorial advisers, all leaders in Australian medicine, who will help guide the editorial direction of the journal.
The MJA is committed to the highest standard of publishing, and to preserving its deserved reputation for accurate, ethical, transparent and trustworthy content.
The redesign aims to improve the quality of medical information and comment in the journal and to enhance the way this information is communicated. It will provide a platform for the journal’s continued evolution, soon to include an improved electronic and web presence.
This journal is written by doctors, for doctors. It is the principal forum for communication between all branches of the profession.
Media coverage of research and issues addressed in the MJA gives the profession an additional voice in the Australian community. I hope that you will feel a sense of ownership of the journal and the direction it is taking, and the freedom to contribute to it.
I thank all the staff of the journal for their expertise and effort in making this redesign happen — we have come a long way in a short time. I would also like to take this opportunity to thank the members of the journal’s Content Review Committee and the thousands of peer reviewers who generously give their time and energy to help make the MJA Australia’s premier general medical journal.
Dr Annette Katelaris is the editor of the MJA.
This article is reproduced from the MJA with permission.
Posted 5 September 2011
Should not “three out of four houses built before 1965 contain asbestos” read “before 1985”?. Fibro, a common building material in Australia, contained asbestos and, in brick houses, was also normally used for lining walls and floors in wet areas (bathrooms, laundries, toilets). We bought a new house in Canberra in 1975 and when enquiring about roof insulation found that “Fluffy Jack” was a leading insulation installer: blown-in asbestos! An enquiry of the government elicited a response that it was lawful. The government later spent a large sum removing it from ACT homes. There are probably homes in NSW where it still exists, a danger to anyone entering the roof space for repair/renovation. The very high cost of removing asbestos, and the low risk for home renovators makes it inevitable that handyman removal of asbestos-cement sheeting will continue.