AUSTRALIANS are having total knee arthroplasty (TKA) at almost twice the rate of people in comparable countries, say researchers who have outlined the importance of selecting the patients most likely to have good outcomes and optimising those patients before surgery.

A narrative review, published by the MJA, noted that in 2016 the rate for all TKA procedures in Australia was 242 per 100 000 population, with most procedures (70%) performed in the private sector. The average in all Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) nations was 126 per 100 000 population, the authors reported.

Dr Christopher Vertullo, a Gold Coast-based orthopaedic surgeon specialising in knees, said Australians were not only more obese than people in most other OECD countries, but also had one of the highest rates of knee injury in the world.

“That’s a dangerous combination,” Dr Vertullo told InSight+.

Dr Vertullo said access to TKA was also better in Australia than in many other OECD nations, and increasing rates also reflected improved surgical outcomes with innovations in prosthesis design and improvements in surgical expertise.

The MJA authors wrote that the minimum requirements for TKA were significant, prolonged symptoms with supporting clinical and radiological signs. They noted that non-operative treatments, including medications, exercise and weight loss were unlikely to reverse radiographic changes, but they may improve symptoms and delay the need for surgery.

The review noted that factors such as mental health and obesity affected both the level of symptomatic improvement after surgery and the risks of surgery. However, they said, neither had been identified as contraindications to TKA because significant health benefits could still be achieved.

The average age of patients undergoing TKA was 69 years, and the authors reported that TKA was thought to be contraindicated in patients aged under 50 years or over 90 years.

However, in an InSight+ podcast, Narrative Review co-author Associate Professor Justine Naylor, from the South Western Sydney Clinical School of UNSW, said TKAs need not be ruled out in younger and older patients.

“TKA is widely regarded as one of the best operations we have,” Associate Professor Naylor said, “so, it doesn’t make sense to limit access if someone can potentially benefit from the surgery, and we do know that even the very young or the relatively older patient can still gain quite large functional and symptomatic improvements from knee arthroplasty, similar to other patients.”

She noted, however, that it was important to consider the specific risks associated with younger and older patient cohorts.

“If you are a younger patient, then you’re going to have a higher lifetime risk of revision and that’s simply because you are going to live longer, so you are going to be more likely to wear out the prostheses,” she said.

Older patients have a higher early mortality (about 8 per 1000 at 30 days post-surgery in patients aged over 90 years) than younger patients (1 per 1000 in those aged under 80 years), but Professor Naylor said the mortality risks were still low at less than 1%.

“If the symptoms and signs warrant the surgery, then this should be discussed with the patient … but there really is no strong age cut-off,” she said.

Dr Vertullo said the Narrative Review highlighted the importance of shared clinical decision making in determining patients who would do well after TKA.

“There’s no magic formula to decide. Everybody wants to be told whether or not they have to have a TKA, but the reality is, it needs to be a shared decision between the GP, the surgeon, the patient and the patient’s family,” he said.

“As a clinician, it’s really important not only to look at the x-ray and say, ‘you need a knee replacement’, but to delve into that individual’s clinical status, the level of symptoms, the expectations around what they want, and, before we do decide to proceed, the maximisation of their non-operative management.”

In addition to selecting the right patients, Dr Vertullo said it was also crucial to select the right prosthesis. He pointed to two recent studies (here and here), of which he is lead author, which found that prosthesis choice affected the risk of infection and revision.

Dr Vertullo said most patients presenting for TKA had not been optimised.

“They haven’t lost weight, they haven’t done a rehabilitation program, they are not adequately taking analgesia,” he said.

Funding was key, he said.

“There is a lack of governmental funding for non-operative rehabilitation for people with musculoskeletal disease even though it’s a massive drain on the Australian gross domestic product,” he said, noting a lack of funding for obesity management programs in primary care.

“Infection is now the number one risk for implant failure, so it’s really important that we maximise a patient’s [management of diabetes]. We also need to make sure they are not colonised with Staphylococcus aureus, which affects about 20–25% of patients. And a patient’s weight is important; the more obese you are, the higher risk the risk of complications.”

The MJA authors found limited evidence to support a role for “prehabilitation” in improving TKA outcomes, and routine programs were not recommended at this time.

Dr Vertullo said there was certainly a role for exercise in non-operative management but acknowledged that there had been mixed results in studies investigating prehabilitation.

“We have done studies on bike riding, showing that pedalling on an exercise bike is highly beneficial to people with osteoarthritis, their [quadriceps] are stronger, and it helps their pain,” he said.

“But for many people, when they get to the point of knee replacement, they are in agony. So, when they get on a bike, it can be [unbearable],” he said. “I say to patients, ride a bike before the surgery if it doesn’t hurt too much, but don’t hurt yourself because it’s more important after the surgery.”

Dr Vertullo said his research group will soon publish a randomised controlled trial showing that patients with TKA who participated in a simple, self-directed pedalling program had superior pain scores at Days 2 and 14 post-knee replacement than patients who had participated in the standard, in-hospital physiotherapy program.

8 thoughts on “Total knee replacement: who should and who shouldn’t?

  1. Deborah Jordan says:

    Until I read this I was convinced I needed a knee replacement. At 58 having survived D.V 3 broken marriages and was so depressed due to having to stop SSRI to rake tricyclic for bladder problems and un explained pelvic pain so the one bloody thing I deserved was a leg to walk and dance on. A dr in my semi rural area was telling me it was bone on bone so surgery was the only option but a family GP in.Sydney was telling me physio. Having read that I will only get 10 years has made me rethink. My pain management dr has been so pleased that I’ve more than halved my opiod use (because my back isn’t hurting after a fall off a ladder 20 years ago well he will have to re think as the pain and the fact that my toes are numb after 15 minutes so hopefully we can do injections and physio. Losing 30 kg will help but it may be 20kg depending what loose skin weights! Any way I will rethink surgery but see the specialist bcoz of the numb toes in case that’s a bigger issue than I realise. I want 20 more years of walking and dancing but I’ll take the safest and best route. Great article!

  2. Andrew Piotrowski says:

    The correlation of public vs private TKA rates of symtoms and wait times would be interesting.

  3. Justine Naylor says:

    Interesting comments

    1. Regarding the pain profile post-surgery, Australian ACORN data (Arthroplasty Clinical Outcome Registry) (www.acornregistry.org) indicate 73% say their knee is much better 6 months post-surgery, so about 27% may be not so happy with their outcome at that time point (13% are a little better, 3% same, 2% a little worse, and 2% much worse). This question is not just about pain, but it is driven very much by their pain, so the proportion who experience significant pain relief is much higher than a third.

    2. According to the NJRR, some 90% of TKA recipients are overweight or obese at the time of surgery (specifically, about 58% obese). People who go through the public sector at many hospitals will be encouraged to lose weight, but they may not get the intensive support that is required to do the job.
    GPs, physios, surgeons etc may well have conversations about weight loss, but we do not know how often. [Some health professionals find those discussions challenging as they do not wish to offend or make people feel worse.] It would be worthwhile to explore the barriers here (and this has been done to some extent).

    3. On-referral by GPs [for people with knee OA] to physio, dietitian, psychologists etc is hampered by the difficulties and limitations of the EPC. Further, private insurers do cover some weight loss programs -encouragement of uptake of these prior to surgery rather than uptake of the intensely supervised rehabilitation programs post-surgery, may be worth considering.

  4. David Maconochie (GP) says:

    I can only comment on the surgeons I have referred to in the Perth area. I do not believe any of them have performed surgery on a patient of mine with financial gain in mind rather than best outcome for the patient.

    It helps that I counsel patients on the rule of thirds: 1/3 are happy because their pain is better, 1/3 have comparable pain levels and 1/3 have worse pain post op.

  5. M. Li says:

    Interesting post and I wish GP’s can really spend time with patients in the primary care setting. I think we should do an audit of GP referrals to find out the quality of the management, including adequate pain relief, weight loss and exercise regimes, physio and hydro thepapies, complimentary medicine including tai-chi, supplements etc. A lot of money can be saved via secondary and tertiary prevention strategies. Surgery should only be a last resort if everything else fails.

  6. Anonymous says:

    The simple fact is that many e are inveigled into knee replacements by their orthopaedic surgeons. They are told: “it’s bone on bone”. As if that means anything other than that they have osteoarthritis. They are also told : “there is no other operation I can do”. Probably true but that doesn’t mean that an operation is warranted.
    They are virtually never told to lose weight, exercise or perform quadriceps strengthening exercises, all of which are known to reduce the symptoms and stave off surgery.
    A knee replacement is never as good as the patient’s own. Their proprioception and balance are “totally shot” after the replacement.
    Of my patients who go on to have a knee replacement, not having done any of the non-operative matters, about 1/3 are happy with the result. About 1/3 are not particularly happy and state if they knew beforehand what they now know after they would never have agreed to the procedure. About 1/3 are very unhappy and state they wish they had never had it done.

    There are far too many TKR’s done for insufficient reasons. And virtually none of them are aware of the limited life span of the procedure and the likelihood f the requirement for a re-do after about 10 years.

  7. Anonymous says:

    A scholarly Orthopod (and an outstanding surgeon), once told me that irrespective of deformity and X-rays, the single most important factor in TKA was night pain (degree of ).

  8. Anonymous says:

    Interesting discussion! We clearly need a more formalised multi-disciplinary assessment process for TKA. It is odd that a beneficiary of the decision to operate holds such power in the decision. We need to remember the 20-30% of TKA patients who are not satisfied down the track despite a technically successful operation. Regards Pain Specialist

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *