PSYCHIATRISTS have sounded the alarm about Australia’s low number of acute psychiatric beds, calling on policymakers to urgently tackle this “huge national problem”.
In a Perspectives article published today in the MJA, Dr Stephen Allison, of Flinders University, and Dr Tarun Bastiampillai, of the South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, said Australia’s comparatively low numbers of acute psychiatric beds could block access for mental health patients when the risks of suicide and aggression were at their highest. (1)
They cited an Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) report that ranked Australia 26th of 34 countries in terms of hospital psychiatric beds per 100 000 population. In 2013, Australia had 29 fewer beds per 100 000 than the OECD average.
They also noted that Australia’s 30-day readmission rates were high in comparison to other OECD countries.
The authors’ call came after the federal government released its response to the National Mental Health Commission (NHMC) report on the Australian mental health sector. (2)
The NHMC had called for a shift in federal expenditure away from acute illness and crisis towards primary prevention, which the government said it supported in principle.
However, the government said “hospital funding should reduce over the medium to long term through embedding early intervention in mental health reform and better planning and targeting primary and community care services”.
Professor Malcolm Hopwood, president of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists, said the college was supportive of the NHMC’s intent to improve community and early intervention services, but not at the expense of inpatient services.
“We really shouldn’t see inpatient mental health care inherently in a negative light. It is a vital part of good mental health care when it’s needed, just as it is in other areas of medicine and it should be appropriately supported”, Professor Hopwood told MJA InSight.
“I am very supportive, where possible, of attempts to intervene early and prevent the development of severe disease. However, our capacity to prevent severe disease currently does have limits and it’s very difficult to imagine that we’re not going to continue to require acute inpatient mental health care for the foreseeable future.”
He said the multilayering of federal and state funding added to the integration difficulties in the mental health care system. “We would certainly be encouraging the states and territories to not reduce their funding of the acute inpatient and acute mental health sector.”
Professor Hopwood said the comparison of bed numbers per capita was not necessarily indicative of inferior mental health services.
“To some degree, this reflects that Australia’s community mental health care system is better than many OECD countries and it’s a good balance in many ways. We would prefer to treat people in the community where possible”, he said.
“But both elements of that system continue to need development and further funding. We still spend considerably less as a proportion of [gross domestic product] on mental health care than mental health care-related disability costs us.”
Professor John Mendoza, adjunct professor of health and sport science, University of the Sunshine Coast, and director of ConNetica, welcomed the government’s approach to mental health funding following the NMHC’s review.
“The Commission proposal is to move growth funding of approximately $1 billion over 4 years, starting in 2017-2018, to community services. Beds will not close as some have claimed”, he said, adding that shifting resources from acute to community care was supported by all mental health commissions.
“We need to be alert to sectional interests who do not want to see this happen”, Professor Mendoza said.
Dr Caroline Johnson, a Melbourne GP and board member of Mental Health Australia, said she was in favour of the spending pendulum swinging more towards prevention and early intervention.
“When I see a patient who needs specific types of care — like additional support from a mental health nurse or a consultation liaison opinion from a psychiatrist in the community — and I can’t get those things, I can see that patient is likely to get worse and reach a point where a crisis is more probable”, Dr Johnson told MJA InSight.
“For most patients with a mental health problem, the majority of their care should be able to be delivered in the community, and yet most of the money is going in the other direction.”
Geoff Harris, executive director of the Mental Health Coalition of SA, said the NMHC was proposing a long-term, system-wide reform to support people to get well, stay well and thereby minimise their use of emergency and acute care services.
“It is well established that if you can provide better care earlier and support people to avoid or reduce acute episodes then this has lifelong benefits of reducing the burden associated with mental illness”, Mr Harris said.
(Photo: XiXinXing / shutterstock)
Loading comments…
More from this week
Newsletters
Subscribe to the InSight+ newsletter
Immediate and free access to the latest articles
No spam, you can unsubscribe anytime you want.
By providing your information, you agree to our Access Terms and our Privacy Policy. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.