IT’S hard to believe anybody would still use a solarium. Tanning salons seem so, well, 1980s, along with big hair and big shoulder pads.
And we know how dangerous they are: several studies have established a link between solarium use and increased risk of melanoma and squamous cell carcinoma.
Australian research shows that people who use a solarium more than 10 times over the course of their life have twice the melanoma risk of those who never use one. The younger people are at first use, the greater the risk.
But, despite extensive media coverage of some tragic cases of melanoma linked to solarium use, the message clearly hasn’t got through to everyone. Type “solariums” into a search engine and you’ll find plenty of businesses still offering this dubious service.
So what can be done?
Regulation of the industry has tightened since 2008, with states and territories introducing laws to, among other things, ban solarium use in minors and those with type 1 skin.
Australian standards also require solarium operators to warn customers that radiation from tanning units contributes to cancer.
Which is great — except compliance with the standards is voluntary and states don’t always enforce the rules about the warnings that have to be given.
The information on cancer risk provided on solarium websites varies hugely, from fairly comprehensive warnings to ... nothing at all.
Some even claim health benefits from tanning, in defiance of regulations forbidding them to do so.
Several advocacy bodies have called for a complete ban on the industry, but attempts to prohibit adults from engaging in activities that cause harm only to themselves don’t really have a history of success.
What we can do is try to make sure people at least understand the risks they are taking, and the best way of doing that might be to take a leaf out of the antismoking campaigns.
Written warnings are all very well, but I say we mandate display of full-colour pictures of melanoma in all tanning salons: over the reception desk and in each cubicle.
If the graphic pictures on cigarettes have to be half the size of the packet, it would be only fair to make these ones half the size of a tanning bed.
Given that these places are in the business of selling beauty, I reckon that could be a real killer.
Jane McCredie is a Sydney-based science and medicine writer.
Posted 4 April 2011
More from this week
Newsletters
Subscribe to the InSight+ newsletter
Immediate and free access to the latest articles
No spam, you can unsubscribe anytime you want.
By providing your information, you agree to our Access Terms and our Privacy Policy. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.